Cromwell’s
Wars at Sea
Edition:
1st
Author:
John Barratt
ISBN:
1844154599
Publishers:
Price
£19.99
Publication
Date: 2006
The 200 years that separate the navy of Drake's day from that of Nelson were critical for the development of Britain's sea power, and the decade of the Commonwealth, of Cromwell's rule, is one of the turning points in the story. In the aftermath of a disastrous civil war and the
execution of Charles I, the navy fought to defend the frail republic against
the rivalry and hostility of other European nations and to extend British
influence across the globe. In this fascinating reassessment of a decisive
phase in the growth of British seapower, John Barratt shows how Cromwell's navy
confronted the threats that came against it during a decade of almost
continuous naval warfare, against the Royalists, the Dutch and the Spanish. At
the same time he describes in detail the naval organization of the day and the
rapid expansion of the service in the early 1650s, as well as the ships and the
seamen who manned them.
Reviewers Wanted
Would you be interested in reviewing books for this website? If you are interested in providing reviews in about 600/800 words within 3 months or sooner then please contact me by e-mail at robjerrard@aol.com providing a small CV and your interests.
For an indication of what is required please see this site, which contains hundreds of examples. "Rob Jerrard's Royal Naval & Maritime Book Reviews" welcomes all categories of reviewers, however if possible I want to know a little about you before I send out an book. Reviewers are normally sent a free copy of the book, however if you already own a book a wish to submit a review it would be considered. In order to assist with costs you will have to agree to pay the postage of any book from my address to you.
Reviewer
Wanted Would you be interested in
reviewing this book? (The Book Above) If you are interested in providing a review in about 600/800 words within 3 months or sooner then please contact me by e-mail at robjerrard@aol.com providing a small CV and your interest in this particular book. I do ask reviewers to agree to review within 3 months and pay the postage, books not reviewed should be returned. For an indication of what is
required please see this site, which contains hundreds of examples. "Rob Jerrard's Royal Navy Website" which currently attracts up to 1,200 visitors per day welcomes all categories of reviewers. The
Fighting Captain Edition:
Pen & Sword Military Classics Author:
Alan Burn ISBN:
1-84415-439-4 Publishers:
Pen & Sword Price
£8.99 Publication
Date: 2006 Publisher’s
Title Information It is not generally realised how close, how very close,
the toll on our Atlantic convoys from 1940 until early 1943 came to bringing
Britain to her knees. Without the
convoys no supplies; without supplies certainly -no Second Front. Captain Frederic Walker RN devised and
employed tactics which were the only sure means of combating and ultimately
defeating the U-boat Wolf packs, but it was only when the Lords of the
Admiralty came to employ these tactics that the U-boats were finally defeated. No one did more to regain control of the North Atlantic
than Captain Walker. His relentless
battle with the U-boat Wolf packs, amounting almost to a personal duel with
Admiral Donitz, is an epic saga which has long deserved a larger page in the
story of our nation's history, though he did achieve the rare distinction of
winning the DSO and three bars. Alan
Burn, who served under Walker, brilliantly recaptures the feeling of those
dramatic days - the sheer bloody hell of the Atlantic weather, the ever-present
menace of the lurking U-boats, but above all the quite remarkable and indomitable
spirit which Walker managed to inspire in all who served in the ships under his
command. Not
only the citizens of Liverpool, where Walker is still revered as a local hero,
but all who hold, freedom dear will appreciate this well merited tribute to a largely
unsung hero who did as much as any man to preserve that freedom. Author’s
Introduction Many
people who read this book will have enjoyed the hospitality of the ships of the
Royal Navy on Navy Days and on their visits to ports throughout the world in
the course of their duties. They
will have been struck by the absence of portholes or indeed any openings
through which the modern sailor can look out to the seas around him or to the
coasts along which he is sailing. Only
from the narrow slits of the enclosed bridge can the outside world be
seen. The visitors will have seen the
Commanding Officer's chair in the Operations Room, where he can sit in the
centre of a platform insulated from vibration and survey a mass of instruments
and screens which enable him to make the instant technical decisions which are
vital in modern warfare. From this
position, the whole operation of the ship is controlled. The
engine rooms are not manned when the ship is at Action Stations. The great brass telegraphs which conveyed
the orders to the waiting stokers in the boiler rooms have gone. The weapons are directed and fired, and in
most cases are even loaded and reloaded, by remote control. As they walk round the deck the visitors
will have seen many notices, 'DANGER. THIS WEAPON MAY ROTATE AND FIRE WITHOUT
WARNING'. They
will have been amazed at the mass of aerials attached to the tripod mast, some
static and some rotating day and night, even when in harbour. Instead of a substantial wooden wheel with
spokes to steer the ship, the coxswain uses a little joystick, but most of the
time the course steered is automatically controlled, like an aircraft. To the old sailor, the only familiar pieces
of equipment will be the compass repeaters and the signal lanterns, but he will
be told that today these are very much the last resort for communication. If they should dare to touch them, they will
find that their operating handles will be heavy and unresponsive from lack of
use. The
modern frigate leaving Devonport in the dusk is a dark and menacing sight. Except for the bare minimum of navigation
lights required of all ships by International Law, no glimmer of light can be
seen from the grey hull as she eases her way past Devil's Point and down the
deep-water channel to the open sea. Captain
Walker's ships were commanded from open bridges with no protection from the
elements. The armament was manned,
loaded and served by seamen exposed to spray, green water and sometimes snow
and sleet. The stokers and engine-room
crews worked below the waterline, behind double-clamped water and airtight
doors. In action, Walker and his commanding officers were rarely absent from
their crowded open bridges, except for visits to the plot in the wheelhouse to
consult the navigator. In darkness, even
these visits had to be kept to a minimum, for fear of losing night vision. On
many occasions, Walker and his key men transferred at sea from Starling to
other ships of the Group. The only way
to do this was by the old Montague Whaler under oars, pulled by five seamen,
with a leading seaman at the helm.
These sea boats were hoisted and lowered by manpower alone, with all
hands tailing on to the falls. Today's
ocean racer has much better electronic navigation equipment and foul-weather
gear than was available even to the Royal Navy in the Second World War, but
otherwise will have no difficulty in imagining these conditions which were
little different from those in which he now pursues his perverted sport. We are told quite correctly
that it is not generally known how close, how very close, the toll of our
Atlantic Convoy from 1940-1943 came to bringing Britain to her knees. This is the story of Captain Frederick John
Walker CB, DSO with 3 Bars, RN. It is a story that has been told before. In 1953 Evan Brothers Limited published
'Walker RN’ by Terence Robertson. It
was reprinted many times up until 1965, with many paperback editions following
that. Like Alan Burn, Terence Robertson
also served on convoy work in the Atlantic as an RNR Officer. In his acknowledgement the
author of this book names the people who have brought this latest book to light
- most of them served in ships under Captain Walker. Since he lists 89 people in all, this makes it a very authentic
record of the events. Albeit not in wartime, I
have experienced an open bridge at sea in cold weather. I served in HMS Aisne. The author in his introduction compares this
to a modern ship and quite rightly points out that Captain Walker’s ships were
commanded from open bridges. Ranged against our escorts
were the U-Boats and 40,000 served at sea in them, 28,000 becoming
casualties. Captain Walker has long
been remembered as one of our most successful escort Captains. Only three of the score of warships that came
under his command were lost. Before
his sea appointments Walker was appointed Staff Officer Operations to
Vice-Admiral B.H. Ramsay based at Dover.
Vice-Admiral Bertram Ramsay, Walker's boss, was Flag-Officer, Dover, in
charge not only of the evacuation of the B.E.F, via the ports of the Lowlands,
Dunkirk, Calais and Boulogne, but also of the demolition of the ports of the
Lowlands, and the provision of naval covering fire. The
Author says that it was beyond the scope of this book to attempt to describe
this evacuation, but the effect on our already depleted force of destroyers and
escorts, and so on the Battle of the Atlantic, was devastating. Of the 338,000
troops brought out, 103, 000 were carried by the destroyers. The Royal Navy
paid for this by the loss of another sloop and nine destroyers sunk, and
nineteen more damaged. So, in these two
months, forty-seven escorts were put out of action, of which the effect is best
described in the words of the official historian. 'The
Destroyers led the operation with selfless gallantry and suffered most heavily.
And those losses were felt grievously during the anxious months that followed,
when every flotilla vessel was needed in the struggle for control of the ocean
communications.’ The
last ship to leave Dunkirk at 0340 on 4 June was the destroyer Shikari, which
Walker had commanded in 1933. We are told that Walker was
appointed to command HMS Stork, a Black Swan Class Sloop in September 1941
(most of the records I have consulted list HMS Stork (L81) as a Bittern Class
Sloop, designed in fact to be a disarmed survey ship, launched 21 April 1936
and scrapped at Troon 3 June 1958. Her
builder was Denny. Of the other ships
Deptford was a Grimsby Class Sloop (L53) and Convolvulus, Gardenia, Marigold,
Pentstemon, Samphire and Vetch were all conventional Flower Class Sloops, as
opposed to the later modified Flower Class). It is interesting that
reading Naval books can suddenly move you back in time to another age, on Page
25 it reads at the fifth paragraph, 'Stanley’s (HMS) masthead lookout wiped off
the lenses of his standard Barr & Stroud binoculars for the hundredth time,
they weighed three and a quarter pounds but they seemed to double their weight
every five minutes. He tried resting
his elbows on the rim of the crow’s nest.
It didn’t work’. Only ex-seamen
would appreciate that memory! HMS
Stanley was sunk by U-574 on 19 December 1941, but then HMS Stork sunk the
U-Boat. Twenty-eight of Stanley’s crew
survived. I hope the masthead lookout
was amongst them. Appendix 1 lists all the U-Boats sunk by Captain Walker’s
ships, it also lists our losses, Stanley, Audacity, Woodpecker and Kite. Appendix 2 gives a history of the ships
involved, viz Escort vessels, Flower Class Corvettes, Hunt Class Destroyers,
modified Black Swan Class Sloops of the Second Support Group viz Starling, Wild
Goose, Kite, Magpie, Wren, Woodpecker, and Woodcock. Appendix 3 - Close Escorts for convoys. After that we have Appendix 4 - U-Boats, Appendix 5 the Asdics
System and Appendix 6 the 'Creeping Attack’. For beginners to WWII
anti-submarine warfare, it might be best to read the Appendices first; even old
hands might employ this method if the memory is a bit rusty. Captain Walker was loved and
respected by his men. After his sudden
death, at the funeral service in Liverpool Cathedral on 11 July 1944 Admiral
Sir Max Horton said at the conclusion of his epitaph "Not dust nor the light
weight of stone, but all the sea of the Western Approaches will be his
tomb". Of Walker Max Horton said, "In
my opinion no single officer at sea did more than Frederick John Walker to win
this battle, (Battle of the Atlantic) the hardest and longest drawn out of
this war". This book should stand as a
tribute to all the men who fought this battle.
If reading this and Terence Robertson’s 'Walker RN’ inspires you to want
to know more, you could try to obtain a copy of 'Max Horton and the Western
Approaches’ by Rear Admiral WS Chalmers published by Hodder & Stoughton in
1954, where these events are well covered. Rob Jerrard Bomb
Alley, Falkland Islands 1982 - Aboard HMS Antrim at War Edition:
1st Author:
David Yates ISBN:
1844154173 Hardback Publishers:
Pen and Sword Price
£19.99 Publication
Date: 15th September 2006 Publisher’s
Title Information This is the untold story of the Falklands War as experienced below deck on one of the most important ships to be despatched to the South Atlantic. It is a no holds barred account as seen through the eyes of a Royal Navy matelot. HMS
Antrim led Operation Paraquat to re-capture South Georgia, and then led the
first attack in North Falkland Sound where she destroyed enemy defences in the
infamous Bomb Alley' or San Carols Water. During the largest air-sea battle
since the Second World War, HMSAntrim came under repeated attack and was struck
by a bomb that destroyed her defensive missile system, but through pure chance,
did not explode, and remained on board wedged in the ‘aft heads'. Other
ships were not so lucky, HMS Sheffield, HMS Ardent, HMS Antelope and HMS
Coventry were all sunk, together with the Cunard container ship Atlantic
Conveyor. Many more were badly damaged by Exit missiles and other air and land
based weapons - most notably, RFA Sir Galahad and RFA Sir Tristram. All told some 255 British and over 700
Argentine men were killed in the three month conflict. The
Author David
'Rowdy' Yates originates from Waltham St Lawrence near Reading, he joined the
Royal Navy in 1976, leaving the service as a Warrant Officer in 2000. He worked for two years offshore in the
North Sea. The
Forward David
Yates was born on the banks of the Thames at Taplow in September 1957 and was
raised a son of Berkshire in the leafy village of Waltham St Lawrence, in the
Thames Valley between Windsor, Ascot, Henley and Maidenhead. Bored
with country life and yearning for global travel, at eighteen, David joined the
Royal Navy at HMS Ganges in March 1976.
In a first stint of service, as 'Rowdy' Yates he served on HMS Salisbury
and then HMS Antrim, where he saw active service during the Falklands War of
1982. He left the Navy in March 1985 to
pursue a career as a Catering Manager, but when invited to return, rejoined in
1987. He
again visited the Falklands on HMS Nottingham in 1988, and saw further active
service on HMS Exeter in the Gulf War of 1991.
Suffering from ill-health resultant from this conflict, he eventually
left the Royal Navy for a second and final time in 2000. David's
autobiographical account covers the period from his birth right up to his
return from the Falklands War in 1982, where his earliest and last naval
recollections were of fairground Laughing Sailors. The book draws heavily upon the diary he maintained before and at
the time of the war, the letters he wrote home, and the three large scrapbooks
he produced on his return. Most
of the characters described in this book have been granted anonymity through
the use of the enormous range of traditional ancient and modern nicknames used
in the Royal Navy, a loose index of which is included. However, not all names have been
fictionalized. After all, who ever heard of a female British Prime Minister
called 'Baggy Snatcher', or an American president named 'Ronnie Raygun'? Apologies
to anyone I offend in this book, but I had to record our actual feelings and
sayings at the time. The
strong language used between the men on the lower deck on board was discouraged
when ashore, and certainly never used in the presence of women - at least not
in the Royal Navy in 1982. An extensive glossary is also included so that
civvies can understand what we matelots were on about. Skua! The
Royal Navy's Dive-Bomber Edition:
1st Author:
Peter C Smith ISBN:
978 1844 154555 Publishers: Price
£25 Hardback Illustrated, 272 Pages Publication
Date: 7th December 2006 Publisher’s
Title Information The Blackburn Skua was the first monoplane to be designed and built for the Royal Navy in the 1930's.
As a result of continued debate, it became a compromise between the
Navy's desire for a carrier-based dive-bomber and the Air Ministry's preference
for a hybrid able to perform in a limited fighter role. A Skua was the first British type to shoot down a fully confirmed Luftwaffe aircraft in World War II, but despite that
accolade, early operations in Norway found the aeroplane woefully inadequate as
a fighter. As
a dive-bomber, the Royal Navy put the design to good use from the outset of
WWII. Skuas were involved with the hunt for the GraffSpee, the sinking of the
major warship Konigsberg but suffered with great loss in an attack on the
Schamhorst. The type helped to keep the
German advance at bay during the Dunkirk evacuation and attacked the Vichy
French battleship Richelieu at Dakar in West Africa. In the Mediterranean the Skua saw hard service at Mers-el-Kebir,
fought to protect convoys to Malta and guided Hurricane reinforcements to the
island. They also attacked the Italian fleet at the Battle of Spartivento in
November 1940 and stood by to dive-bomb the German fleet at Brest harbour. Their final duties were as trainers and
target-towing aircraft in a role they continued to serve in until 1944. This
book relates how the final design was created, how the dive-bombing technique
was developed and perfected by naval pilots and it traces the wartime
operational career of the type including many first hand accounts. The
Author Peter
Smith is known to aviation and maritime history readers with over 65 previously
published books. Peter is working
closely with those involved in the restoration project, being organised by The
Fleet Air Arm and the Bodo Museum in Norway, to preserve the first Skua to' be
recovered from Norway. Author's FOREWORD I
have wanted to write this book for half a century. I have been researching and
writing about dive-bombing and dive-bombers for most of that time and have
written the definitive histories of every aircraft of that type, but not the
Skua. It is not that this little aircraft did not interest me; indeed, she has
fascinated me for all that period. Why no book then? Well, this is Britain, and
in Britain we honour everyone and everything except our own. So my various
publishers down the decades would happily publish the umpteenth book on the
German Junkers Ju87 Stuka and the American Douglas Dauntless, but not the
British Skua. They took more persuading for me to write the books on the
Russian Petlyakov Pe-2 Peshka, the American North American A-34 Apache and
Curtiss SB2C Helldiver, the Japanese Aichi D3A1/2 Val and even the Vultee
A31/A35 Vengeance, American-built, British and Australian flown - but not the
Skua. Even when the Fleet Air Arm Museum at Yeovilton dragged the wreckage of a
Skua from a Norwegian fiord and made a diorama of it, I could not get a hearing
for her. Quite
why the only British-built and British-operated dive-bomber should be shunned
when the others were favoured has always irked me. So, down the years I spoke
to veteran flyers, delved in untouched files and asked questions. Much of what
I discovered of the Skua story I used in other, more general, books on
dive-bombers, but I always knew that the full story deserved to be told and
needed to be told before it was too late and all first-hand knowledge had
faded. That
marvellous man, 'Dickie' Rolph, who for many years was a rock and a guide in my
Skua research, and to whom I confessed my frustration at this lack of
intelligence in the publishing fraternity, once advised me, with the wisdom of
age, 'Remember the story of Bruce and the spider ... don't give up'. Well
Dickie, you are gone now, but I didn't give up, and here, thanks to an
enlightened editor, Peter Coles, and a fearless publisher, Henry Wilson of Pen
& Sword, here at last is the full story of the Royal Navy's only true
dive-bomber and her achievements against the odds. Peter
C. Smith Riseley, Bedford, 2006 "The Bruce," Robert I, King of Scotland, after six successive defeats by the English armies, was a fugitive in a lonely hut, and there saw a spider try six times to cast his thread from one beam to another and succeed on the seventh try. Bruce took courage from the spider's perseverance, fought a seventh time, and won. The author tells us in his
Foreword that he had wanted to write this book for half a century. He quite correctly points out that he has
written the definitive history of every aircraft of that type, but not the
Skua. Why not the Skua? Well, it seems in Britain we honour everyone
and everything except our own and the power lay with the publishers. The Skua was British built and British
operated and I am pleased that the story has finally been told, and told in
such detail by an author who has written 57 books previously. As with other books by this author, the
story is told fully and is the definitive record with many excellent
photographs, diagrams and appendices. We gain an insight into this
unique aircraft when we find that Appendix 1 lists her ‘Firsts’. In her
career she notched up: First -
monoplane in Royal Naval service; First -
all-metal aircraft in Royal Naval service; First -
British aircraft to shoot down a Confirmed German aircraft in the Second
World War; First -
aircraft in the world to sink a major warship by dive-bombing; First -
British aircraft to have a bomb-ejector fork for bomb to clear propeller in
dive; First -
British aircraft with sleeve-valve engine; First -
British aircraft to feature Koffman starter gun for engine; First -
British aircraft to mount four Browning guns clear of prop. No CC gear; First -
British aircraft to feature two-speed propeller (two pitch positions); First -
and only aircraft to be fitted with anti-spin tail parachute; First -
British aircraft equipped with radio-homing beacon on new VHF; First -
British aircraft to have front gun reflector sight; First -
British aircraft fitted with oxygen bottles and supply lines. The first five chapters
cover the birth and production of the aircraft before Chapter 6 takes us 'Into
Battle'. The third 'first' records
the 'First Blood' when:- 'During the period 25 to 26
September 1939, both No. 801 and No. 803 Squadrons were embarked aboard Ark Royal, which
was operating in the North Sea. The Skuas were flying continuous patrols over
the fleet. A section of No. 803
Squadron's Skuas were launched when a Dornier 18 sighting was made. Their target had the dubious distinction of
becoming the first German aircraft to be destroyed by any British service in
the Second World War. This aircraft fell to the Skuas of Lieutenant B S McEwen,
with Petty Officer B M 'Horse' Seymour and Lieutenant C L G Evans, with
Lieutenant W A Robertson. After a brisk chase and skirmish, she was finally
shot down by ‘Horse’, a Telegraphist/Air Gunner (TAG), from the back of his
aircraft. The German floatplane was forced down on the sea reasonably intact
and stayed afloat until the destroyer HMS Somali closed with her and took off the crew
before sinking her'. The shooting down of the
Dornier 18 is often cited as the first kill by a British Aircraft in World War
II - In fact the first was by Sgt F A Letchford, an observer/gunner in a Fairy
Battle Bomber of 88 Sqdn RAF on the 20th September 1939. Sgt Letchford's claim was not confirmed
straight away. This presumably is why
the author in this book correctly uses the term, ‘Confirmed’. The book records very many
of the actions in which the Skuas were evident. It details the fate of many crew members, with lists giving an
insight into losses such as Table 22 on Page 153. In the attack on Scharnhorst, 13 June 1940, the Royal Navy
effectively lost a whole squadron of highly trained veteran airmen when 8 Skuas
were destroyed with 6 deaths plus (1 death from wounds and 9 captured). It wasn’t always the enemy -
even in those days it could be friendly fire!
Unfortunately on 28 May 1940 2 Skuas were intercepted by a full squadron
of 24 Spitfires, which immediately attacked them from astern, badly damaging
both aircraft and reference is made to the account of Midshipman Hogg (Sub
Lieutenant (A) Graham Angus Hogg DFC & Bar RNVR) ‘The Camouflaged Coward 1956’. Sub Lieutenant Hogg is credited as having
shot down 4 enemy aircraft in the air with 8 shared kills. There are
extensive detailed footnotes with each chapter, which combined with an
excellent Index makes this a valuable asset to any library where readers have
an interest in Royal Naval aviation. It covers the sinking of the Königsberg in unprecedented
detail The book is
dedicated to the memory of Skua TAG Richard S 'Dickie' Rolph BEM, whose advice
regarding getting this book published was "remember the story of Bruce and the
spider...don't give up." Rob Jerrard The
Cinderella Service Author:
Andrew Hendrie ISBN:
1844153460 Publishers:
Pen & Sword Price
£25 Publication
Date: 2007 Publisher’s
Title Information This book reveals the vital contribution that RAF Coastal
Command made to the Allies war effort. Although often referred to as the
'Cinderella Service' because by its nature, it did not gain the recognition it
deserved and was overshadowed by Fighter and Bomber Commands and considering
that it was not given priority in terms of aircraft and equipment, its wartime
record was second to none. The two main roles of Coastal Command were
anti-submarine work in the Atlantic and anti-shipping operations against enemy
warships and merchant vessels. This work looks at every aspect of the command's
work, equipment and aircraft and draws upon many first-hand accounts. Lengthy
and comprehensive appendices cover Orders of Battle, Commanders, U boats sunk,
ships sunk aircraft losses and casualties. The
Author’s Preface In
this book I have attempted to show the part played by Coastal Command in the
Second World War. I have given emphasis to the two main roles of Coastal
Command, namely its work in antisubmarine warfare in the Battle of the
Atlantic, and the Command's anti-shipping operations against both warships and
merchant vessels. Coastal's other roles, including meteorological flights,
air-sea rescue, minelaying and photo-reconnaissance, have also been considered. By
the nature of such work, Coastal Command did not gain the recognition it
deserved, and was overshadowed by Fighter and Bomber Commands, which generally
were given priority in respect of aircraft and equipment. As
the prime needs of an air force in war were aircraft and armament, I devoted
two chapters to those subjects, taking the view that some understanding of such
technical aspects are essential for a proper appreciation of Coastal Command's
work. The
book is based on the following primary sources: operational records of
squadrons, the Command's records, and some Cabinet files. Additionally, I have
corresponded with many Coastal Command veterans and interviewed others. The
retrospective views of some of those former aircrew have been included. My
‘research’ really began on 3 April 1939, when I joined the RAF for training as
aircrew, but my wartime operational flying with Coastal Command began in
February 1942 and ended in May 1945. I
therefore consider that this book, which I can claim was written from the
inside, presents the subject by one who was actively involved. The
theme is that although Coastal Command was the ‘Cinderella’ in respect of
aircraft, equipment and publicity, it surmounted those limitations and made a
considerable contribution to the Allies' war effort. Andrew
Hendrie Above
us the Waves The
Story of Midget Submarines and Human Torpedoes Edition:
2006 Paperback (First published by George G Harrop & Co Ltd 1953 Price 15s) Author:
CET Warren & James Benson ISBN:
1844154408 Publishers:
Pen & Sword Military Classics Price
£9.99 Publication
Date: 2006 The pioneers of two-man torpedoes or 'chariots' were the Italian Navy.Following their attack on
ships of the Royal Navy in Alexandria harbour in 1941, Winston Churchill wrote
to General Ismay in 1942, "Please report what is being done to emulate the
exploits of the Italians in Alexandria harbour and similar methods of this
kind…. one would have thought we would be in the lead, please state the exact
position." When
it was decided to go ahead, 'volunteers were called for'. However, because revealing what was involved we would have informed the enemy, these volunteers were not told the nature of
the task. Moreover to do so may have brought forth the wrong types - suicidal or death or glory boys, which was not what it was about, albeit there was a large risk of being taken prisoner. Naval
divers had salvaged an Italian chariot after an abortive attack at Gibraltar
and two men were chosen to form the teams - Commander GM Sladen and Commander
WR Fell. A more detailed account of
the Italian operations can be found in 'The Frogmen' by Tom Waldron and James
Gleeson, published in 1950 by Evan Bros Ltd.
Very many paperback editions were also published between 1954-1970 by Pan books.
That book, 'The Frogmen' looked at the same subject matter with
additional details of the work of Lt Commander LKP Crabb, OBE, GM, who served
in the Royal Navy from 1939-1948. He is
remembered for the 1956 dive on the Russian cruiser Ordzhonikidze in which he
lost his life - but that is another story, see “Commander Crabb - The Amazing
Story of a Remarkable Man” by Marshall Pugh. The
first batch of ten Charioteers completely unaware of their destiny, assembled
in Blockhouse (HMS Dolphin, Gosport, Hampshire) in April 1942. They immediately
began training in the diving tank with DSEA (Davis Submarine Escape
Apparatus). Review. On
Page 18 the author tells how the day finally dawns when they went to Horsea
Loch, situated in a deserted corner of Portsmouth harbour - 'a sheltered
stretch of water, trough-shaped, to a depth of 30 feet'. I always called this Horsea Island. It was from all appearances an island
containing what was described to me as a torpedo testing lake about a mile long. I did my first Royal Navy diving course
there in 1959, or was it 1958 during a very cold November using oxygen
re-breathing equipment. It was still
very similar to the diagram (sketch) of human torpedo oxygen breathing
apparatus shown on Page 21 of the book, except that our sets did not have such
an endurance of 9 hours. There
were other things at Horsea, but perhaps the Official Secrets Act still
applies. The
Royal Navy had dived on 'closed-circuit' oxygen for obvious reasons, because
oxygen was re-breathed via a container of CO2 absorbents, it gave off no
bubbles. It did of course present
problems. A)
Sometimes when going onto pure oxygen you tend to have a black-out. B)
You cannot dive below 33 feet because if you do you may get oxygen poisoning
because the partial pressure of oxygen falls below one atmosphere. C).
If water got into the sodalime CO2 absorbent you could get an alkaline
burn. We always carried vinegar in
diving boats for that reason. The
absorbent had to be changed after every dive. The Admiralty instruction had
been distributed in 1934: 'The
C02 absorbent granules must be renewed after use when the set is laid aside
prior to further practice. Remember
that breath on the granules starts the chemical reaction, which continues after
breathing ceases, so that in a very short time all the granules are -useless. So remember that if you do breathe on the
granules and leave them you might not be the one to wear that set in a case of
emergency . . . you therefore might, perhaps, commit murder.' This
then is the story of these men. Not
necessarily what you might think, but at first, RNVR officers, two Army
officers, and 31 Ratings including such trades as cooks, signalmen, and stokers
in additional to the Seamen branch. I
was twelve when this book was first published and a Royal Marine Cadet at
Eastney. It was these men and the SBS
that inspired me to join the Royal Navy with the specific objective to become a
diver. It
was at Horsea the first casualty occurred.
Lt PCA Browning failed to surface and helmet divers later recovered his
body. This
book takes us through the whole war as chariots and X-Craft operate against
targets at Altenfjord, Trondhjem, Askvoll, Bergen, Normandy, Spezia, Palermo,
Sicily beaches, Tripoli, Hong Kong, Saigon, Phuket and Singapore. Thirty-nine
officers and men lost their lives, and are listed in Appendix 3. Appendix 2 lists all awards viz VC-4, CBE-3,
DFO-11, OBE-1, MBE-10, DFC-17, CGM-6, DSM-12 and BEM-4 - a total of 68, plus
100 Mentioned in Despatches. However,
referring to LS Magennis the citation says this:- 'A
lesser man would have been content to place a few limpets and then to return to
the craft. Magennis, however, persisted
until he had placed his full outfit before returning to the craft, in an
exhausted condition. Magennis displayed
very great courage and devotion to duty and complete disregard for his own
safety.' Diving
is dangerous, diving on oxygen is even more dangerous and in wartime there are
of course other factors to take account of, not the least that you cannot
afford to be seen. A review cannot do justice to these ordinary
men who did extraordinary deeds. You
will need to read the book to learn of their training, the 'Sladen Suit', what
oxygen re-breathing is like, cold hands, silk underwear, Midget Submarines described
in full with all their operations, good men lost, vessels lost and finally
paying off. Perhaps
it is fitting to close with the words of the world's greatest ever submariner,
Admiral Sir Max K. Horton, G.C.B., D.S.O., spoken in reply to the toast of
"The Guests" at the First Reunion Dinner of the Twelfth Submarine
Flotilla Association: 'I
can only say that the one object these people set out to achieve in the first
place was to see that the Tirpitz would never endanger us at sea again,
particularly up there where the Russian convoys had to go. She never did. She was immobilized. And
these people were responsible.
Similarly, their other operations showed the same singleness of purpose,
were almost equally ambitious of concept, and achieved the same out-standing
success. One can only say: Well done!' I
know any ex-Royal Naval diver or submariner will enjoy this book. However perhaps it is now time for a new
generation to get some idea of what these early pioneers did. Rob
Jerrard HMS
Fearless Edition:
1st Author:
Ewen Southby-Tailyour ISBN:
1844150542 Publishers:
Pen & Sword Price
£25 Publication
Date: Publisher’s
Title Information HMS
Fearless was commissioned in 1965 as the first of two assault ships. She combined in one hull a tank landing
ship, a troop transport and an amphibious command ship. Over nearly four
decades she proved expert in all of these roles plus acting as a floating 10
Downing Street (for Prime Minister Harold Wilson's talks with Ian Smith of
Southern Rhodesia), embassy, exhibition hall and co-ordinating centre of civil
aid projects, for which she was awarded The Wilkinson Sword of Peace. Throughout
her life she was intimately involved in Britain's changing foreign policies.
Operationally, she landed a force into South Arabia, the ‘tanks’ into Northern
Ireland, was the central player during the Falkland's campaign, helped Britain
withdraw from Africa and the Middle and Far East and ended her life playing a
key role in the initial Afghanistan operations. She
acted as the Dartmouth Training Ship, was at the forefront of Britain's Cold
War trials in the Arctic, served on the front-line, along NATO's southern
flank, featured in a James Bond film and took part in some 140 operational
exercises. Inevitably there were tragedies and a collision and a grounding but
her record was, as this superb book shows, exceptional. When
Fearless paid off in 2002 she was, apart from HMS Victory, the oldest ship in
commission. Like Victory, she can
justifiably claim to be the most famous and influential ship of her era. Her story, told here in words and pictures
by one who knew her intimately, will be welcomed by all those sailors, marines
and soldiers who served in her, and loved her.
Naval historians will also recognise this as a book that demands to be
read. The Author When
he retired from the Royal Marines in 1992 as a Lieutenant-Colonel, Ewen Southby-Tailyour
had served in HMS Fearless under every Commanding Officer. Duties included command of the 4th Assault
Squadron, Arctic trials and the Falklands campaign. He also served in HMS Anzio, Wizard, Intrepid and Bulwark, USS
Mount Whitney, Guadalcanal and Raleigh and FS Arrontanches and the submarine
L'Estre. Ashore he commanded a company in 45 Commando and was Operations
Officer of 42 Commando. He fought in
the Dhofar war and was awarded the Sultan of Muscat's Bravery Medal in
1968. He commanded the Falklands Task
Force Landing Craft Squadron and was subsequently appointed OBE; later he
formed 539 Assault Squadron, Royal Marines. On retirement he served with the Foreign Office in Serbia and
built a gaff cutter for high-latitude exploring: he was elected Yachtsman of
the Year for 1982. His
account of the Falklands War, Reasons in Writing, and Blondie, the biography of
LieutenantColonel H G Hasler, were recently republished by Pen and Sword. His most recent book, The Next Moon,
describes the life of a SOE agent behind enemy lines. He
and his wife, Patricia, divide their time between a farm in Devon and a house
in the French Pyrenees. They have two
children and three grandchildren. Foreword By
The Lord Carrington, KG. First Lord of the Admiralty: 1959-1963 Secretary
of State for Defence: 1970-1974 Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth
Affairs: 1979-1982 Ewen
Southby-Tailyour, with the help of her Commanding Officers, has written a
splendid biography of HMS Fearless: her ups, her downs, the excitements and the
boredom, coupled with trenchant comments from successive Ships Companies. It
so happens, that when the idea of an Assault Ship of the type of Fearless and
Intrepid was being considered, I happened to be First Lord of the Admiralty and
I remember well the discussions which led to the eventual commissioning of
Fearless. By the late 50s, the Landing
Ship Tanks, which were used during the Second World War, were out of date and
obsolete and, incidentally, exceedingly uncomfortable, as I remember when
crossing the Channel in June 1944. From
this discussion came Fearless and Intrepid
I have to say that those of us who looked at the drawings, did not think
that they were likely to be very beautiful ships, nor were they. Looking back, it is astonishing to realize
that the cost of the ship was only £8 million.
A small yacht is as much as we could expect today, though at that time,
their Lordships were aghast at the price. Fearless
never took part in a major war, thanks to the deterrent which NATO posed during
the Cold War years but as you will read, there was a good deal of incident in
her thirty-seven years, not least, of course, the battle for the Falkland
Islands. At the same time, she was the
venue for a number of interesting meetings.
The most significant being to host the Prime Minister, Harold Wilson,
together with his entourage, during one of the endless discussions with Ian
Smith. The entourage, as you will
discover, provided some hilarious moments. Colonel
Southby-Tailyour writes with first-hand knowledge. This is a fascinating and enjoyable book and more importantly, a
valuable piece of Naval history. HMS Fearless was in commission from 1965 until 2002. She had a long and distinguished
career. When she came home at the end of the second commission (1967-1969) I had just left the Royal Navy. However, I drove down from London to Plymouth to meet her and went onboard because my brother was serving in the ship as an Army Sergeant in the Pay Corps (not his fault someone has to join the Army). This is a very detailed book
with many interesting photographs. I
noticed immediately that the contents pages after Chapters 1 and 2 are listed
under a Captain’s name, rather than as many books of this type are, in
Commissions. It seems a novel but good
idea, since we always remember the Captain’s name, but not necessarily the
officers. This beggars the question,
‘Does the Captain remember you?’ Cynics
may say that this depends on how often you appeared at Captain’s defaulters’
table! In the Introduction the author states "at the outset I was determined that each Commanding Officer should introduce his own chapter - indeed stamp his mark on 'his'
chapter much as he stamped his mark on 'his' time in command: I would then
merely add in the linking narratives. It has almost worked out like that with
each Commanding Officer setting the scene. Those that asked to see what others
had written were refused - that way there would have been too much uniformity -
for, surely, no Commanding Officer had ever asked, in advance, how his
predecessor had commanded Fearless? For my part, I have made no serious comment
on Fearless's 'characters' at any level but have, only occasionally, done so on
outsiders and events. If there has to be a secondary aim, mine has been quite
simple: I have wanted to explain how the ship worked, how she was manned and
for what purpose. In doing so I hope to have shown how much fun life in
Fearless could often be and how stimulating and challenging it certainly was -
and, thus, how professionally rewarding." As
an ex-Lion, that is I served in HMS Lion, http://www.rjerrard.co.uk/royalnavy/lionrn/lionrn.htm I
was a little put out by the sub-title ‘The Mighty Lion’ because I thought we
had already claimed the title and the Commander’s comment after Lion’s first
commission in 1962 that "Lion is the smallest big ship we have ever known" was
borne out by my experience when our Captain, John Scotland remembered my name
in about 1969 when we met on Liverpool Street Railway Station. That Lion can trace her lineage back to the
Armada of 1588 and she was the Flag Ship of Admiral Sir David Beatty at
Jutland, the first ship to open fire and it is doubtful if we Lions will
relinquish our possession of the term ‘Mighty’ to a mere Gunboat of 1794! After all, our motto was "Our Deeds Agree
with our Name". This
book is a fine record of a ship that saw much of modern history. She was commissioned as the first of two
assault ships. HMS Intrepid was the
other. To continue the description
given in the introduction she was a combined tank landing ship, a troop
transport and an amphibious command ship. Her career spanned nearly four
decades. At one point she was a
floating 10 Downing Street (for Prime Minister Harold Wilson's talks with Ian
Smith of Southern Rhodesia.) Throughout
her life she was intimately involved in Britain's changing foreign policies.
Operationally, she landed a force into South Arabia, the ‘tanks' into Northern
Ireland, was the central player during the Falkland's campaign, helped Britain
withdraw from Africa and the Middle and Far East and ended her life playing a
key role in the initial Afghanistan operations. She
acted as the Dartmouth Training Ship, was at the forefront of Britain's Cold
War trials in the Arctic, served on the front-line, along NATO's southern
flank, featured in a James Bond film and took part in some 140 operational
exercises. Inevitably there were
tragedies and a collision and a grounding, but her record was, as this book
shows, exceptional. When
Fearless paid off in 2002 she was, apart from HMS Victory, the oldest ship in
commission. She can justifiably claim
to have been an influential ship of her era. Was
she a happy ship? There are of course
those for and against. We find such comments as, ‘Worst draft of my life’. ‘Happy to see her made into razor blades,
just like Albion, another rust bucket.’
‘Sink it! It's a tub.’ ‘Truly awful ship.’ ‘Cramped rust bucket, long
past her sell by date.’ ‘Melt her down for scrap and use the money to buy hats.
That's if you can actually melt down rust.’ ‘Heap of rusting scrap. Will be
glad to see the day the breakers get the gas cutters on the old heap.’ ‘Served
78-80 very unhappily.’ ‘Worst draft in 27 years. Would like to think I will be
shaving with bits of her.’ ‘Drop the nostalgia trip guys it’s only a lump of
rusting tin.’ ‘Accommodation dreadful, nothing worked, chronic chain of
command, some extremely spiteful individuals in positions of authority.’ ‘When
it goes to the bottom, I shall be extremely glad indeed.’ However
the author points out that 'It is probably more instructive, though, to read
just a fraction of the 500 or so e-mails that offer an opposing view - all from
the lower deck:' EG, "She was one hell of a ship, just like a small village,
very friendly and lots of pubs." I
enjoyed the book and share some of the memories and I am sure my brother
does. This is certainly a book worth
owning and it will take its place in my Maritime Library. Whether
you loved or hated the ship during your Commission I am certain you will wish
your grandchildren knew something about a ship you served in. Rob
Jerrard Seven
Seas Nine Lives A
Biography of Captain AWF Sutton CBE DSC & Bar RN Edition:
1st Author:
Richard Pike ISBN:
1844153533 Publishers:
Pen & Sword Maritime Price
£19.99 Publication
Date: 2006 Publisher's Title Information Captain Alan William Frank Sutton's enthralling biography starts when, as a young midshipman he was in command of a small picket boat returning a potentially mutinous crew to the battle-cruiser HMS Repulse on which he served. The book builds to an amazing and exciting climax which ends in the open cockpit of a Fairey Swordfish torpedo bomber during the legendary attack on the Italian fleet at Taranto in November 1940. The Littorio sees us: she opens fire. The flashes of her close-range weapons stab at us. First one, then others - everything opens up along her whole length. We're coming in on her beam; we're in a terrible mass of cross-fire-cruisers, battleships, shore batteries, the lot. The bloody Italians are firing everything apart from major armament. But we're low, too low for the enemy gun-aimers. The place stinks of cordite and incendiaries and burning sulphur. Everywhere is wreathed in smoke - thick, choking, foul stuff. This biography has been written with the full cooperation of Captain Sutton who has given the author fascinating insight into a career of remarkable courage and diversity. Review I have to admit that I had to persevere with this
book. Because it is a biography, it is
written in a style which makes it hard to concentrate. It is full of such sentences as, ‘the
Midshipman thought’, ‘the Midshipman reflected’, ‘the Midshipman mused’, ‘the
Midshipman remembered’ and every so often we are taken off on a different tack
whilst the author relates an item from history only to return to our Midshipman
again, who later becomes a Lieutenant and joins the Fleet Air Arm. At chapter 13 when our Midshipman has become
a Lieutenant the role is reversed, its title is, ‘discussions with a
Midshipman’. It is however a good story,
a story worth telling and one from which I learnt something. The parts I enjoyed most were Part 1, which is the
Midshipman’s view of the Invergordon mutiny and Chapter 19 onwards, which covers
Lieutenant (as he was by then) Sutton’s time on HMS Illustrious and the attack
on Taranto in which he took part as an observer in a Swordfish and was awarded
a DFC. The narrative does wander
off to explain the Battle of Jutland, but returns to cover very fully a dark
stain on a government that cut sailor’s pay by 25% (for an Able Seaman a
reduction of a shilling a day). This
was well before my time, but to many old matelots who I drank with in the pubs
of my hometown of Portsmouth, it was a time of severe hardship. The Captain of HMS York had the nerve to
suggest that wives should take in washing which received a reply from the rear
‘you fat bastard! How would you like your old woman to crash out dirties’. We are told that Invergordon was once a Boom
Town. It was a very quiet place when I
visited in HMS Lion in 1961. I always
remember a notice displayed outside a shop on a Sunday which read, ‘A bus will
pass through here’. And of course no
alcohol on a Sunday. In one chapter an
explanation is given as to how to lash a hammock. Did Captain Sutton check the Naval Ratings Handbook as I did
before explaining it or is his memory better than mine? I slept in a hammock in my first two ships
in 1958, HMS Grafton and HMS Chichester, but I had to check; and he is
correct. How many ex-Boy Seamen and
Midshipmen can remember? Hands up and
be honest. Lieutenant Sutton was not
very impressed with the food in HMS Illustrious, but admits that the officers’
accommodation far exceeded the ratings Mess Decks and yes, he is correct in his
assertion that after a tot of rum - 1 /3 rum and 2/3
water anything can be eaten! I
have no complaints about the food in her sister ship Victorious – however that
was two decades later after a major re-fit.
I was disappointed that the
narrative finishes on the last page with a quick jump from 1941 to Captain AWF
Sutton CBE DSC & Bar retiring in 1964.
All we know of his subsequent career is that he was Commanding Officer
of the Royal Naval Air Station Hal Far, Malta.
I would have liked to have known something of his peacetime career. There cannot be many men
still alive who flew in Swordfish, particularly those who took part in the
Taranto raid and it is good to have another account of that Operation. Rob Jerrard Nelson
the Commander Edition
2005 (First published 1972) Author:
Geoffrey Bennett ISBN:
184415307X Publishers:
Pen & Sword Military Classics Price
£9.99 Publication
Date: 2005 Paperback Because
2005 was the 200th Anniversary of the Battle of Trafalgar and the
death of Horatio Nelson, Vice Admiral of the White, Knight of the Bar, Baron
and Viscount of the Nile and of Burnham Thorpe and Hilborough in the County of
Norfolk, Duke of Brontë it was inevitable that I should find
myself reviewing many new books on this subject. I have reviewed
‘Nelson’s Hero’, ‘Nelson the Admiral’ and ‘Nelson’s Trafalgar Captains and
their Battles’, all of which whilst reiterating old facts also examine new
material. New material has been
located, much of which came to light with the Nelson Letters Project
commissioned by the National Maritime and Royal Naval Museums in which over
1,400 hitherto unpublished letters were located in 35 archives all over the
world. There has also been
Sheila Hardy’s study of Lady Nelson, who unlike Nelson’s biographers who
portrayed her as a cold and colourless woman, looks at the marriage from
Fanny’s point of view and shows us that she was a very loving and supportive
wife, who in the end was treated very badly. Geoffrey Bennett’s
‘Nelson the Commander’ was published in 1972.
In the Acknowledgement dated 1970 he acknowledges the debt he owes to
the numerous books already published.
The 45 years since then have added considerably to that list. We now know more of Nelson the man, Nelson
the husband, but what about Nelson the Commander? We are told at Page 1 that in 1945 the Labour
Government discontinued an annuity of £5,000 a year granted to Nelson’s heirs
in perpetuity – this was after the death of the 5th Earl. The author appears to criticise this. However it seems a more than reasonable time
to have paid a pension. £5,000 a year
for 140 years = £700,000. Nelson
himself understood that Parliament was supreme. On Page 18 he is quoted as saying, "I must either disobey my
orders or disobey Parliament, I determined on the former". It isn’t quite so
simple now; I wonder what Nelson would make of the next paragraph taken from a
Law report? ‘Leaving aside any question as to the
primacy of European Community law, which does not arise in this case,
Parliament is the supreme law-making body for the United Kingdom and a statute
enacted by Parliament which cannot be read under s 3(1) of the Human Rights Act
1998 in a way which is compatible with the convention prevails over any
provision of the convention or any judgment of the European Court whether the
statute was passed before or after the coming into operation on 2 October 2000
of the 1998 Act which incorporated most of the provisions of the convention
into United Kingdom law. The sovereignty of Parliament and the supremacy of an
Act of Parliament over the convention is recognised and confirmed by s 4(6) of
the 1998 Act which provides that a declaration by a court that a provision of a
statute is incompatible with a convention right does not affect the validity,
continuing operation or enforcement of that statutory provision.’ Nelson would have
welcomed change. Last Saturday I flew
back to Southampton from the South of France in about ninety minutes. Since I was reading Geoffrey Bennett’s book,
I was wondering what Nelson would have thought? Even to me it seems amazing reflecting on the 3-4 days sailing
time to Gibraltar in my Naval days. Nelson said, "After cloud comes
sunshine". I am sure he would have been
satisfied that his Government paid his family for 140 years as well as all the
other rewards his victory at Trafalgar brought. On Page 3 the author
refers to the legend, that the black neck silk has been part of a Seaman’s
uniform for more that a century in perpetual memory. This legend is easily destroyed by reading Page 60 of the Naval
Ratings Handbook BR 1938, 1965 edition, which says ‘Uniform
was not introduced into the Royal Navy until comparatively recent times - -.when
the need arose, as when boarding the enemy, devices such as coloured scarves or
headgear were worn as distinctive emblems. Up
to the middle of the last century sailors did not wear prescribed
uniform - -.. It was not until 1851 that
detailed uniform regulations for officers and men of the Royal Navy were laid
down and the sailor was given a complete issue of kit on joining the Service.
Many changes have been made since then, but the main principles remain the
same. The
sailor's collar dates from the time of wigs and pigtails, - -. The
scarf, of silk or other good material and of any colour (black included), was
part of the sailor's dress long before the days of Nelson, when it was worn as
a comforter or a sweat-rag. It cannot
be said, therefore, that it was introduced as mourning for Lord Nelson. In 1857 the colour was standardized as black
and the material as silk. The
bell bottoms of the trousers were originally designed so that the trousers
could easily be rolled up to the knee, to prevent them from getting wet when
scrubbing decks or in heavy weather.’ The author reminds
us on Page 4 that Nelson as a Commander only had one victory over an enemy
fleet at sea. At Copenhagen and the
Nile he destroyed ships at anchor. Also
on Page 4 we are reminded of Sir Winston Churchill’s phrase, the author says, "What
was there in Nelson, in an age when the Royal Navy thrived on ‘rum, sodomy and
the lash’(Rum Bum and Baccy), that turned his captains into a ‘Band of Brothers’, and moved the
roughest sailor to tears on hearing of his death" This of course is
another oft-misquoted phrase or should I say that it is an untrue statement
often misquoted. Nelson’s family like
many others were able to take advantage of the system to get a child’s name on
a ship’s books. We are told that Nelson
was entered on the books of HMS Raisonnable on 27 November 1770. He didn’t join her until March 1771 when he
was twelve years six months, not young by the standards of the day. The author quotes the case of Admiral of the
Fleet Sir Provo Wallis, who was first entered
on a ship’s book at the age of four. The picture often
painted of Nelson is not quite true. He
was a Parson’s son, but his uncle was Comptroller of the Navy, which gave him a
better start than many others. From time to time in
the book the author refers to Nelson’s wife Fanny – Frances Herbert Woolward (Nisbet)
later known as Frances Herbert Viscountess Nelson, Duchess of Brontë as is
inscribed on her tomb at Littleham churchyard, Exmouth, Devon. Like many male biographers he says such
things as “Nelson and Fanny were as fire and water, as a hawk mated to a
dove. There might be love in a physical
sense, but there was little intellectual companionship, no spiritual
companionship. His enormous vitality
was at odds with her shy, retiring disposition”. It is fair to say as Dr Colin White says in his Foreword
‘Frances, Lady Nelson – the Life and Times of an Admirable Wife’ by Sheila
Hardy. “Frances Nelson has not been
served well by her husband’s biographers, most of whom, of course have been
men”. One reason was that not so many
of her letters survived, but her letters to his prize agent Alexander Davidson
discovered in 2001 have helped to redress the balance. Perhaps she should adopt the expressions he
used, "after clouds come sunshine". Apart from the book
now being dated it still remains a valuable contribution and a lot can be
learnt not only of Nelson, but of the lives of others. It covers chapters such as ‘Neptune’s cradle
1758 – 1792’, ‘Ships of the line 1793 –
1796’, ‘The Fleet in which he Served’
and goes on through his life – it remains a classic and is very well written
and finishes with, ‘The legacy’ – to what use good or ill, did the Royal Navy
put to the legacy that Nelson bequeathed to it in the two centuries after his
death? Nelson was the kind of Commander
who ‘Threw his bonnet over the moon’ to quote Field Marshall Montgomery. They say he only ever won one battle against
a fleet at sea, but at the Battle of Cape St Vincent, who was it that wore
(stern to the wind) HMS Captain out of line and passing between Excellent and
Diadem cut off the main Spanish Fleet?
Nelson was made a Knight of the Bar, which in fact he wanted. He didn’t actually want a Baronetcy because
he lacked the means to support it. Even
John Jervis knew that Nelson’s quick thinking had won the day. Many new books have
been published since 1970 but this book still stands well with them all. Rob Jerrard Admiral
Lord St. Vincent Saint Or Tyrant? The Life of Sir John Jervis, Nelson's Patron Author:
James D. G. Davidson ISBN:
184415 386 X Publishers:
Pen & Sword Price
£19.99 Publication
Date: May 2006 Press
Release First
modern biography of a major naval figure of the Napoleonic era This modern biography of John Jervis, who became Admiral
of the Fleet Lord St Vincent makes compelling reading. St Vincent, who was born twenty-three years
before Nelson fundamentally influenced the younger man's career despite the two
men being very different characters.
Without him, Nelson's genius might have been submerged by professional
jealousy or emotional fragility. It was
St Vincent's strategy and preparation which positioned Nelson to win his three
famous victories, while St Vincent himself made vital contributions not only to
the defeat of Napoleon, but to the well-being of the Royal Navy. Before
Jervis became First Lord of the Admiralty, the Navy had been severely weakened
by corruption in the dockyards, nepotism in appointments and the appalling
conditions under which the seamen lived and worked. St Vincent set out to correct this situation and he deserves the
profound gratitude of the nation. This
superbly researched and well-written book recounts how this controversial
seaman put his duty, as he saw it, before everything else, in defence of his
country and for the improvement of the Royal Navy. It is compelling reading for everyone. James
Davidson served as a naval officer in the Atlantic, Pacific, Mediterranean and
Persian Gulf. Present at the Japanese surrender in 1945, he was Assistant Naval
Attache in Moscow at the time of Stalin 's Death. As a St Vincent boy, The
first vessel to bear the name St Vincent was a Line-of-Battle ship of 120 guns
launched in 1815, during the lifetime of Earl St Vincent. It had a distinguished career as a flagship
both at home and in the Mediterranean.
In 1862 her active career ended, and from then until 1906 she was a
Boys’ Training Ship, lying at a buoy in Portsmouth Harbour. In
1906 the old ship was broken up at Falmouth after ninety years of service and
her figurehead was then transferred to HMS GANGES at Shotley, which had opened
the previous year as a Boys' Training Establishment. From
1906 until 1945 the figurehead stood on a pedestal at the main gate at
Shotley. In 1946 a replica was made for
HMS ST VINCENT where it was erected inside the Main Gate. It was therefore one of the first images
seen by a new recruit coming through the gates for the first time. We attended school every day
and lessons included Royal Naval history -the discipline of John Jervis was
very much still with us. They didn’t
flog or hang us, but by the standards of the day it was hard for a fifteen year
old straight from school. John Jervis, later Earl St Vincent, like Nelson had an
early springboard for entry into the Royal Navy. As the author puts it both had naval relatives on the maternal
side. On Page 2 we are told his father
was a successful barrister. There does
seem to some confusion here, was he a barrister or a solicitor, perhaps in
those days the distinction was not so important? On Page 3 when Jervis was twelve his father was appointed to a
position at Greenwich Hospital, which we are told was as a Solicitor; Greenwich
had been adopted to accommodate naval pensioners. This is not quite the picture of a humble background that Jervis
would have people believe. He
said, ‘Having fought my way up to where I now stand, without the smallest
pecuniary aid from any one, even when I was a mid, I cannot possibly entertain
an opinion that officers of this day, whose half-pay is considerably more than
formerly, cannot practise the same necessary economy which marked the character
of, My dear Sir, your very sincere and obedient servant, St Vincent.’ He did spend four years as
an Able Seaman before being rated Midshipman, but then all youngsters started
in a similar vein some being rated Captain’s Servant as a start. He claimed in later years that his father
gave him £20 and that was it. It seemed
to have very much shaped the way he thought and his attitude towards waste and
corruption. In 1758 Lieutenant Jervis
was given command of Foudroyant, a prize that had been taken from the
French. His Captain was so impressed
with him that he demanded his return as First Lieutenant of Neptune. He was made Post Captain in 1760 at the age
of twenty-five, when he was given command of The Gosport a 34-gun frigate. Like so many officers he went on half-pay in
1763 at the end of the Seven Year War.
In February 1769 he was appointed to command the 32-gun frigate Alarm,
one of the first of a new type of frigates with a copper-sheathed hull,
something we had learnt from the French. Between 1772-1775 Jervis was
again on half pay but by 1 September 1775 he was back in command, this time the
80-gun Foudroyant, now the largest two-decker in the Royal Navy and the same
ship he had taken to England as a prize in 1758. In April 1782 he won
sufficient prize money to marry his first cousin Martha Parker. This was a result of an action against the
French ship Pégasé and it was interesting because we are told that Jervis took
the advice of a Midshipman to alter course opposite to his intentions, albeit
he did not acknowledge the Midshipman’s contribution in his report. He was awarded a Knighthood, the Order of
the Bar, the equivalent of the KBE today. He took the motto ‘Thus’,
Thus is a contraction of "Very well Thus," which was the old order to
steady a helmsman on his course. The modern order is "Steady". In 1784 he became MP for
North Yarmouth and he spoke in a debate for the first time on 31 May 1785. His speech included criticism of the custom
of promoting youngsters to the rank of Lieutenant without the requisite service
at sea. He did not support the
movement to abolish slavery. In 1789 he
was promoted to Rear Admiral of the Blue, aged fifty-two. He was promoted Vice Admiral 1 February
1793. His finest hour could be
said to have arrived at the battle from which he took his title – the Battle of
Cape St Vincent. Opposite Page 101 there
is a very good sketch plan of the Fleet in the early stages of the battle on 14
February 1797, which shows exactly how Nelson wore his ship around and passing
between Excellent and Diadem cut off the main Spanish Fleet. Why the title, Saint or
Tyrant? Perhaps the expression, ‘he did
not suffer fools gladly’ would sit well.
He believed that the threat of mutiny depended less upon the
personalities of potential mutineers, than upon the skill and humanity of their
officers. But equally he often showed no
mercy to those who by the standards of that time, if guilty would and were hung
that very day – even on a Sunday. He certainly would not
qualify as a saint by modern standards, not in a society that considers a
schoolteacher who smacks a child as a child abuser. As for the Sexual Offences Act of 1967 (Sexual Offences Act 2003)
which allowed buggery between consenting adults – Jervis had four men of the St
George hung at 0900 hrs on a Sunday and made their own shipmates do it as the
church pennant was hoisted. History
never records the names of all those hung for a variety of reasons. Following an argument with
Sir John Orde, Jervis and St John were both bound over to keep the peace,
probably under the Justice of the Peace Act 1361, a very ancient statute. Presumably if both were Able
Seamen and it happened aboard a ship, two more nameless souls would have
hanged. It is said that St Vincent’s
greatest contribution was the discipline he imposed upon being made Commander
in Chief Channel Fleet. He also appreciated
that health and good medical care were fundamental to morale and
discipline. He accepted the challenge
to ready the fleet and when the time came, ready they were, ready to face the
combined Fleet of France and Spain. From 1801 onwards Jervis battled
against corruption, indeed it could be said that he waged war against it. He advised people to promote on merit and
nothing else. Some of the worst abuse
lay within the Royal Dockyards. He
abided by certain principles and adhered to them and advised others to do the
same and he had a deep regard for Nelson, in whom he recognised a champion. Jervis’s last appointment
was finally terminated on 24 April 1808.
In retirement he took a general interest in local matters and is
reported as being very generous. He
took up the cause of Lady Nelson and referred to Lady Hamilton as “ that
infernal bitch”. He made his last
speech to the House of Lords on 23 January 1810. He died on 14 March 1823 of `excessive weariness and unrest'.. He isn’t buried at St Paul’s or Westminster
Abbey, but like another great leader Churchill, near his birthplace. There is a monument to his memory in St Paul's Cathedral. The
author sums up in his last paragraph thus, ‘Looking back at his career and
acknowledging the debt Britannia owed him for his lifelong dedication to
protecting her from invasion by Napoleon, there is still a measure of regret on
two counts: that Nelson's debt to his patron has not been acknowledged, and
that St Vincent himself sometimes failed to put merit above prejudice and
humanity above discipline’. Let
it be THUS. Rob Jerrard The Battle of the Atlantic Edition:
Paperback (Reprint) Author:
MacIntyre, Donald ISBN:
1844153665 Publishers:
Pen & Sword Military Classics Price
£6.39 ($11.15) Publication
Date: 2006 Publisher’s Title
Information The Battle of the Atlantic -
a name coined by Churchill - was the unremitting assault that went on
throughout the war on Allied merchant ships that were the lifeline of Great
Britain and, from 1941, Russia by aircraft, surface ships but, above all, by
the U-boat. Captain Macintyre, who was a distinguished participant in the
battle, tells the story with precision and clarity. He describes the measures
employed to defeat the amazingly successful 'wolf-pack' tactics of the U-boats,
the convoy system and individual convoys, the contribution of the Royal
Canadian Navy, the technological advances in radar and asdic, depth charges and
aerial support, and does not shirk from describing how desperately close at
times was the outcome. Not only does he analyze the strategic issues, above all
the importance of the convoy system and of continuous air-cover, he also
describes the battle from the viewpoint of the participants themselves. The
long drawn-out duel between escort and U-boat is made vivid by quotation from
the log-books of some of the ablest escort-commanders and from the
combat-reports of the German U-boat ‘aces’. Complementing these eye-witness
accounts, nearly 50 unfamiliar photographs, drawn from German as well as
British sources, make the courage and endurance of all those who fought in the
Atlantic the more immediate. Review To a nation used to the thunder of
broadsides fired from those glorious wooden ships of battle, often by gunners
who could literally look each other in the eye, this is the story of a new
warfare. Today’s broadsides come from
the monster battleships slinging shot at each other across distances so great,
they may never see each other. Far
different were the battles fought against Hitler’s U-boats in the Atlantic
between 1939 and 1945. MacIntyre takes
us inside the U-boats themselves, describes the agonies of allied lives lost
and records the eventual successes and victory. To the unarmed merchant seamen charged
with keeping Britain fed and armed, this was a battle fought just as close as
in Nelson’s day but without broadsides of their own. Regularly attacked by an
enemy they could not see, they continued to volunteer, to sail and to die as
merchant ships in their hundreds were sunk.
Dry in its detail, MacIntyre’s account takes us though the growing pains
of a navy learning how to cope with the new reality of submarine warfare. In the early days of the
war, the Royal Navy is forced to play catch-up. As German submarine commanders develop their technique and
millions of tons of valuable goods are sent to the bottom, the navy scrambles
to counter. New avoidance maneuvers are
tried, submarine hunting becomes a priority, but through those early years, the
U-boat packs hold the upper hand.
Britain’s naval history is one full of victories, of successes and of
heroism. Much of that enviable record comes from “expecting every man to do his
duty.” The battle of the Atlantic put
the Admiralty chiefs and every civilian and naval sailor to the test. In doing their duty, Captains found new
methods to hold off the wolf packs, boffins developed technologies to find the
hidden hunters and ordinary seamen fought on. Eventually the pendulum
swung away from the German captains. As
the new convoy escort methods were fine-tuned and better technology sought out
and located the U-boats, the list of submarine losses grew. At the same time, the horrendous loss of
merchant ships decreased. MacIntyre’s
research tells us more than mere numbers, it provides us with insights that
include individual names of Captains and sailors lost on both sides, making
this a very intimate account of the battles.
While we see that pendulum of technique swing from the Germans to the
British, we also see a shift from the traditional chivalry of the gentleman
combatant to the brutality of Hitler’s regime. In the beginning of this key
element of the Second World War, both sides took great pains to rescue those
left floundering in an unkind sea. Prisoners were taken and treated with
civility. Hitler’s edicts changed all
that. As their initial supremacy waned, U-boat captains no longer observed the
conventions. Defeated Captains were no
longer invited into ward-rooms, swimming sailors were abandoned to the elements
and occasionally machine-gunned and self-preservation became all-important. Sadly, there were many instances of British
escort captains forced to leave swimmers to die as they chased off to hunt an
attacking U-boat. This was clearly a
new war, one in which the Royal Navy learned by its mistakes, but learn it did
– to ultimate success. Phillip Day Frigates, Sloops and
Brigs Edition:
Paperback (Originally published in two
volumes) Author:
James Henderson ISBN:
1844153010 Publishers:
Pen and Sword
Military Classics Price
£7.99 Publication
Date: 2005 Publisher’s
Title Information Admiral Nelson's most
frequent cry was for more frigates. Though not ships of the line these fast and
powerful warships were the 'eyes of the fleet'. They enabled admirals to find
where the enemy lay and his likely intentions, as well as patrolling vital
trade routes and providing information from far-flung colonies. Together with
their smaller cousins, the sloops and brigs of the Royal Navy, they performed a
vital function. Generally commanded by ambitious young men, these were the
ships that could capture enemy prizes and earn their officers and men enough
prize-money to set them up for life. The fictional characters Horatio
Hornblower and Jack Aubrey hardly surpassed some of the extraordinary deeds of
derring-do and tragedy described in these pages. Originally published in two
volumes, this book is a bargain for all who want the factual low-down on the
Brylcreem Boys of Nelson's navy. Review "If I had been censured every time I have run my ship, or fleets under
my command, into great danger, I should have long ago been out of the Service
and never in the House of Peers". Horatio Nelson Unwittingly, Nelson
wrapped up the successes and failures of all of Britain’s naval history in that
simple personal philosophy. If a timid Admiralty had expected our captains to
consider caution and preservation more important than getting the job done, we
would forever have been a third- rate maritime nation. Instead, men were sent
to sea to get a job done, to seize the oceans and to build and protect an
empire. While the great
ships of the line received all the glory and their captains the accolades,
always in the background setting the battle stage were the other heroes, the
frigates, sloops and brigs. These were the swift and sure smaller ships who
patrolled and kept the seas British, while the major ships fought their crucial
battles and accepted all the credit. Henderson’s Frigates, Sloops and Brigs
properly gives us the whole story, describing in amazing detail, the voyages,
battles, successes and failures of England’s best. This volume is a
testament not only to the captains and crews of these smaller ships; it is a
testament to Henderson’s love of research. The level of detail is remarkable.
We can easily imagine ourselves aboard the Shannon as Captain Broke defeated
the American Chesapeake. We know the extent of battle damage, to the ships and
to the crews on both sides. We even know how many rounds of ammunition were
expended. This is the kind of detail that could have been the dry facts of the
ordinary historian had Henderson not made it interesting,
had he not put us in the midst of the many personal battles of these sea-going
heroes. Nelson also said “No captain
can do very wrong if he places his ship alongside that of the enemy.” Before
they became the masters of ships of the line, all of Britain’s best-known
admirals served in smaller ships. They learned their craft, including the
audacity and courage to fight right alongside the enemy, no matter the relative
size, in the frigates and smaller ships. They believed in their ships and gained
a confidence in their crews’ fighting abilities that could only come from a
dedication to training. These less well-known heroes honed their skills and
ruled the seas more on a ship-to-ship scale than in the fleet-to-fleet battles
of the admirals that we glorify with songs, poetry and monuments. In war, these
ships were to Nelson and his peers as Richard Sharpe and his riflemen were to
Wellington’s army (Bernard Cornwell’s fictional account of the skirmishers who
laid the groundwork for the major land battles of the Napoleonic wars). For lovers of naval history,
particularly those who imagine themselves saving the seas for England in those
dark days of peril, Frigates, Sloops and Brigs is a must. Henderson pulls no
punches as he describes the human frailties of some captains, the inevitable
failures of crews not properly trained and the problems of giving command to
patronage-appointed officers. It wasn’t all glory and our ships were not always
the best or fittest, but Henderson’s research has managed to uncover the cause
of every defeat. He also puts the spotlight on those many captains, crews and
ships who were never recognized for doing their duty for England. Phillip Day Rodney & the Breaking of
the Line Author: Peter Trew ISBN: 1 84415 143 3 Publishers: Pen & Sword Price £19.99 Publication Date: 23
February 06 Press Release George Brydges Rodney, later
Admiral Lord Rodney, had anything but a conventional career, as this fascinating
biography graphically demonstrates. His promising early career had run into the sand during
the long years of peace following the Seven Years War. When Britain and France
found themselves at war again in 1778 as a result of the latter's support for
the American colonists, Rodney had exiled himself in France to escape his
creditors. It was only due to the generosity of a French nobleman that he was
able to return to England. The main emphasis of this
work is on Rodney's final two years of active service as Commander-in-Chief of
the Leeward Islands Station during the closing stages of the American War of
Independence. A measure of his dominance at this time can be gauged by the fact
that of the twenty-one enemy ships of the line captured or destroyed by the
Royal Navy during the whole of that War, Rodney accounted for fifteen. His
years of glory culminated in his defeat of the Comte de Grasse's Fleet at the
Battle of the Saintes fought off Dominica on 12 April 1782, where he famously
broke the French Line. Despite his undoubted
fighting qualities, Rodney was a hard superior and difficult subordinate. His
aloof and autocratic character won him few friends and he was also accused of
letting his desire for prize money cloud his professional judgement. But there
is no question that his prowess inspired others, not least Nelson himself. Peter Trew served in the
Royal Navy, worked in the building industry and was Conservative MP for
Dartford. He has written numerous articles for maritime journals and published
a book on the Boer War. The subject matter of the
book is as the title indicates a journey through the life and times of George
Brydges Rodney (1718 – 1792), Admiral Lord Rodney with discussions and diagrams
depicting and examining his battles leading up finally to Saintes 12 April
1782, upon which opinions are divided – did Rodney break the French line by
accident or design and if deliberately was it his idea or does the honour lie
elsewhere? In a year when so many books
have appeared about Nelson it is perhaps correct to examine the life of a
British Admiral who may have influenced him, albeit this is another unresolved
question. Review We are told that, the
esteem in which the Royal Navy held its former Admirals at a particular time
can be gleaned from the naming of new ships and it goes without saying that all
ex-Navy men will know of HMS Rodney.
Perhaps not so many will recall the Battle Class destroyer HMS Saintes
commemorating Rodney’s final and most famous battle. Other ships names come to mind, HMS St James, St Kitts,
Trafalgar, Corunna, and Jutland to name a few. The chapters on his early
life and flag rank prepare you for the main event - his Battles, and it is as
well to familiarise yourself with the areas involved by looking at the excellent
diagrams and maps beginning with the one on page 31 It does not seem that Rodney
was popular, at times, he blames all around him when things go wrong, when
Admiral Rowley told him that he used his own initiative he was told bluntly
"The painful task of thinking belongs to me".
An example of one of his
despatches appears on page 70.
"Aggrieved as Rodney was by the conduct of several officers, he
mentioned only one by name in his official despatch of 26 April, namely Captain
Robert Carkett of the Stirling, of whom he said: 'Had Captain Carkett, who
led the van, properly obeyed my signal for attacking the enemy, and agreeable
to the 21st Article of the 21st Additional Fighting Instructions, bore down
instantly to the ship at that time abreast of him, instead of leading as he did
to the van ship, the action had commenced much sooner, and the fleets engaged
in a more compact manner, and the enemy's centre and rear must have been taken
or destroyed. His penultimate paragraph
was a stinging rebuke to the defaulters in general: I cannot conclude without
acquainting their Lordships, that the French Admiral, who appeared to me to be
a brave and gallant officer, had the honour to be nobly supported during the
whole action -'tis with concern inexpressible, mixed with indignation, that the
duty I owe my Sovereign and my country obliges me to acquaint your Lordships,
that during the action with the French Fleet, on the 17th instant, His
Majesty's, the British flag was not properly supported' There seems to have been
many occasions when he blamed others and he cannot have been a popular
man. He particularly seems to have
picked on officers who came up from the lower deck. Rodney finally found himself able to praise his subordinate
commanders after the Battle of Saintes. Did he break the line? The last chapter, Aftermath discusses
this. Nelson is reported to have
said, 'Rodney broke the line in one point; I will break it in two. This episode, if correctly reported,
provides reasonable evidence that Nelson intended to emulate and to improve on
Rodney's tactics of a generation earlier; but to which of Rodney's actions was
he referring? Rodney broke the enemy line
in two actions while Commander-in-Chief in the Leeward Islands from 1780 to
1782. In his biography of Nelson,
Captain Mahan assumed that he was referring to the Saintes but that Nelson had
got the details wrong: 'Rodney's fleet actually, though accidentally, broke
through de Grasse's order in two (if not three) places.’ During the battle the French
employed their usual practice of firing high in order to hit masts, spars,
sails and rigging, and thus cripple an opposing ship rather than inflict losses
on her men. The lines were so
protracted, with Royal Navy and French ships, that it was 9.25 am before Hood's
flagship, the Barfleur, fired her guns. Rodney had backed the Formidable’s topsails to prolong his
exchange with the Ville de Paris, and was nearing the last ships of the French
centre. Then came a shift in the wind from a steady breeze from east-south-east
to light and variable winds from nearer south. This signified a crisis for de
Grasse. His line, fell into confusion;
ships fouled each other and fell away to leeward. A gap opened near the advancing Formidable, which had already
been made use of by the Duke. His
commander-in-chief followed him. The French line was well and
truly broken. Many, including the
partisans of Mr John Clerk of Eldin, a Scots amateur writer on naval tactics,
would claim credit. Lord St Vincent, summed the
matter up in a few words: 'Rodney passed through the enemy's line by accident,
not design, although historians have given him credit for the latter.' If this
was the truth, it did not detract from Rodney's achievement, he won the day. The battle ended French and
Spanish hopes of capturing Jamaica from the British. Rodney was created a peer
with £2000 a year settled on the title in perpetuity for this victory. The two big controversies of
the battle can be summed up as:- Firstly, Rodney’s failure to
follow up the victory by a pursuit was much criticised. Rear-Admiral Sir Samuel Hood said that the
20 French ships would have been captured had the commander-in-chief chased. On
the 17th Hood was sent in pursuit of the enemy and he captured two of the line
in the Mona Passage. Secondly, the tactic of
"breaking the line", in which the Royal Navy ships passed though a
gap in the French line, engaging the enemy from leeward and throwing them into
disorder. Rodney
does not lie in Westminster Abbey or St Paul's, but in a modest Hampshire
church at Old Alresford. Rob Jerrard HMS Victory Warships of the
Royal Navy Author: Iain Ballantyne
& Jonathan Eastland ISBN: 1844152936 Publishers: Pen & Sword Price £19,99 Publication Date: 2005 The book begins with six
pages of nautical terminology, which for any reader not familiar with naval
terms is good. Another method is to
incorporate it into the text as on Page 2 where we have the term, ‘warping out’
which is explained with a small sketch.
We are an island nation and often use terms without knowing the true
meaning eg only yesterday my wife, referring to the traffic said it was 'chock
a block' which made sense seeing that it is the same as 'two blocks', viz ‘when
the lower block of the tackle is run close up to the upper one, you can hoist
no higher, the blocks being together’.
See 'The Sailors Word Book', Conway Maritime Press, Page 184. Before we reach the current
HMS Victory at Chapter 3 onwards, the author discusses the previous ships that
bore the name taking us back 416 years to 1588 and sailors of Victory 'warping
out' due to a lack of wind because the Golden Hind had brought news of the
Armada off The Lizard. The current Victory was laid
down in the dockyard at Chatham on 23 July 1759 and floated up 7 May 1765 and
is the seventh ship to carry the name.
Chapter 3 gives us her vital statistics viz 36 sails, 4 acres of canvas,
capable of 6 knots at a cost of £63,176. A ship familiar to many of
us native to Portsmouth is Foudroyant: There is an interesting photograph of
her on Page 40 taken in Southampton’s No 5 dock in the 70’s. We know of course that this is not Nelson’s
Foudroyant. From 8 June 1799 to 28 June
1800 he was her Admiral. The ship shown
at Page 40 is the Trincomalee now back in Hartlepool under her original
name. For a long period of my youth she
was a familiar sight afloat in Portsmouth harbour. On Page 67 we meet Gunner
Rivers and his son William aged 7, injured assisting his father in the year
1795. We follow their story throughout
the book with Victory at Trafalgar and beyond into their twilight years as they
struggle to exist in the harsh times before the Welfare State and automatic
pensions. It certainly takes some
believing that William ‘volunteered’ aged 5 years. He was born in Portsea in 1788 and joined Victory in 1793. I would like to see a complete book about
the Rivers family, but all we have is the collection at the Royal Naval Museum
(RNM) 1998, 41. This is an aspect of the
book that makes it all the more readable.
We consider the lives of some of the ordinary officers and men who
manned these ships without whom none of these victories would have been
possible. On Page 71 Chapter 5 we meet
a familiar man, certainly to those of us who started our careers at HMS ST
Vincent. The name stands out, ‘I did
what I could to keep them in order, but a fleet is a difficult thing to manage”
Admiral of the Fleet, Earl St Vincent, Sir John Jervis, Nelson’s Mediterranean
mentor. Victory's
gunner, William Rivers, mailed a heartfelt plea to their Lords of the
Admiralty. Victory, Chatham Nov 12 1797 "My
Lords, I humbly hope you will not be offended at the liberty I
take in addressing this letter to your Lordships on behalf of my son who at
present belongs to His Majesty's Ship Victory, of which I am Gunner. He is only
at this time 9 years and half old notwithstanding he has been previously at sea
three years and half but under my own care and protection. He was rated
midshipman on 23 February by favour of Captain Grey on consideration of my
large family and long services in His Majesty's Navy. He is at present too
young to take care of himself and in want of a proper education to qualify him
for a sea life for which he is intended, as well as two more of my sons still
younger than himself. I
hope your Lordships will have no objections to grant an order to discharge him
at present from the Service that he may be put to a Maritime School for two or
three years and not be turned over with the Ships Company, to a strange ship
where it is not on my power to follow him. His name is William Rivers". We
learn that when the Rivers father and son left her. When commissioned into service once more, she would welcome back
old friends, not only Horatio Nelson, but also Rivers the Gunner and his young
son, by then a teenage midshipman. All three would fight aboard Victory in the
greatest sea battle in history, in which one of them would lose a leg and one
would be killed. Glory
always has its price. You do meet others - AB
Benjamin Stephenson, RM Musician John Whick, Lt Lewis Roteley who all come into
the narrative as our story unfolds.
Many of our characters went to sea far younger than Nelson eg St Vincent
was aged 10. There is an excellent
photograph on Page 103 of HMS Martin.
She was a brig,
of 503 tons, one of five used by the Royal Navy for training boys out of
harbour. Built in 1890, the Martin and
others were swept away in Lord Fisher's scientific naval training
programme. Martin was similar to
essential eighteenth century brigs and sloops, but carried less sail on shorter
yards. On Page 84 there is a photograph of HMS St Vincent, which really shows
what a magnificent ship she really was with 120 guns and 4673 tons was bigger
than Victory. The
caption says, "The Battle of Cape St Vincent cast a long shadow. Not only was
Jervis made the Earl of St Vincent, a warship was, in time, named for both him
and the battle. HMS St Vinccat (120 guns) is pictured here airing sails off
Gosport, one of the largest first rates built in England, laid down at
Devonport in 1810 and launched in 1815. Significantly larger than HMS Victory
at 4,672 tons, she was first commissioned in 1831, almost wrecked off Malta in
1834 and took part in the Baltic campaign of 1854 before coming to Portsmouth
in 1862, where she was used as a training ship, until broken up by Castles of
Millbank, London in 1906." ‘Casts a long shadow’ is
certainly apt for us St Vincent boys; even in our old age we remember a tough
year of training. How must it have been
for the boys who started on an old sailing ship moored off Gosport? Merton
Place, the home which Nelson purchased for Emma, her husband and Nelson’s baby
cost £9,000 (£550,000 in today’s money).
This ménage a trois did not go down with St Vincent, who regarded Emma
as ‘a diabolical bitch’. I have a book called, Emma
Hamilton by Norah Lofts. Inside
somebody has pasted a newspaper cutting dated, July 1979, it reads: “£45,500
for Lady Hamilton notes Two
working manuscripts for "begging letters" written by Emma, Lady
Hamilton, to the Prince Regent and the Prime Minister, Lord Liverpool, asking
for money- in return for her services to the nation, sold for £45,500 at
Sotheby's in London. The mistress of Lord Nelson claims indirect credit for
the fleet's victory at the Nile in 1798, for convincing Nelson to attack at
Copenhagen three years later-and for persuading him to take command of the
fleet for his most famous victory: Trafalgar in 1805. It’s hard to be humble.
This book is superbly illustrated, well researched and very enjoyable. Rob Jerrard Naval Battles of the First World War Author:
Geoffrey
Bennett ISBN:
0850529891 Publishers:
Pen & Sword Price
£7.99 RRP UK Publication
Date: In his other Book "Naval Battles of the Second World War". Captain Bennett
discusses the traumatic effects of the Washington and London Naval Treaties on
the fleets of the principal powers between the wars, and their astonishing
growth and technical progress between 1939 and 1945. He then deals with the war
in the Atlantic and the Mediterranean. The Battle of the River Plate, the
struggle for Narvik, the hunt for the Bismarck, the destruction of the Italian
Fleet at Taranto and Matapan are all vividly described and authoritatively
analysed. The below book is on the First World War Review Every Briton of a certain age and all of us who ever
served in the senior service have spent a good deal of our lives hearing the
stories of the Royal Navy’s glories. We
came to know that, for the best part of at least 500 years, "Britannia Ruled
the Waves". We grew up admiring Drake’s
disdain for danger, Raleigh’s cunning, Nelson’s heroism and Beatty’s
panache. We dreamed of being one of
those heroes; coolly making the Spanish wait for their destruction, calmly
sailing into the French guns or driving through the German High Seas Fleet to
victory at Jutland. We celebrated the victories,
forgot the failures and ignored the frailties of those very human admirals we
set up on their pedestals for posterity.
In his account of the British/German encounters from 1914 to 1918,
Geoffrey Bennett gives us an account of the many battles of that war, 'warts
and all'. That his bibliography takes
up a full three pages is an indication of the research needed to present these
important battles in such detail. That
depth of enquiry could not help but uncover the good and the bad, the mistakes
and successes and both the sun and the rain of good and bad fortune. This is the story behind the
victories. It is not just a full
account of the actual battles, it is our first look at the evolution from
traditional to modern tactics in naval warfare. We see an Admiralty struggling
to make that change while their captains wavered between the traditions of
Nelson and the opportunities of the moment.
This was certainly the last war of chivalry, of enemies who respected
each other and treated prisoners like gentlemen. It was also a time when high
casualties lists were taken in stride – for the glory of England. We know the names and we
glorify them - Churchill, Jellicoe and Beatty; those in high places who
continued Britain’s glorious tradition at sea, putting them on pedestals as the
nation heard of their successes and preserving their memories for all
time. Bennett’s research lets us also
see into the lives, successes and failures of the supporting players. We hear
about the unsung captains and crews who gave their all for the country and he
doesn’t ignore the common ratings as we read about their heroic efforts to
ensure success. Bennett saw a victory
as much a triumph for the British ships’ engine room and boiler room crews as
for those who manned their turrets. In an account presented from
both sides, Bennett doesn’t ignore the successes, failures and frailties of the
Germans. We read about names almost as
famous as our own heroes. Scheer, Hipper and Graf Spee are shown to be real
people, not just battleships of the second great war. He shows these German
admirals making mistakes in concert with the mistakes on the British side. The Kaiser’s ratings suffered and died in
their thousands during the battles along with our own. They even stopped to rescue British sailors
from death in the sea as our ships did.
Bennett’s look below the surface of these battles shows these warriors
to be little different from our own. For the student of naval
tradition and history, this book is a must.
It explores the causes, the luck, the coincidence and the humanity of
success and failure that are so often missing from the legends deliberately
designed to bolster a nation’s pride. Phillip Day Execution For Duty The Life Trial & Murder of a U-boat Captain Author: Peter C. Hansen ISBN: 1 84415 322 3 Publishers: Pen & Sword Price £19.99 Publication Date: 15th Dec 2005 Press Release This is the true story of the
life of a young U-boat captain. It reveals the harsh cruelty and political
intrigue that surrounded Hitler's Reich and pinpoints the devious machinations
of those Nazis who had infiltrated the power-base of the Kriegsmarine in 1944. Oskar Heinz Kusch was born on 6 April 1918 and joined the German
Navy on 3 April 1937. He worked his way successfully through naval college and
eventually volunteered for duty in U-boats. During this period in World War II,
the underwater service was causing havoc to Allied shipping in the Atlantic and
was highly regarded as the elite force of the German navy. It was at this time
that he learned his trade, sailing on long operational voyages that often
lasted for several months. He had an exemplary service record that was
confirmed by all the skippers under whom he had served. Eventually he gained
his own command in the 2nd U-boat Flotilla. Before his second operational voyage as Captain, three new junior
officers joined the submarine. These replacements were confirmed Nazi believers
and were not popular aboard, constantly praising all the heroes of the Reich
and never conceding that the demise of the U-boat was approaching because of
the increased use of more sophisticated radar techniques used by Allied
aircraft and ships. The voyage happened to be unsuccessful in terms of Allied
ships sunk and unbeknown to Kusch the three hatched a plan to dishonour their
Captain and accuse him of treason. The resulting trial was corrupt and rigged. No latitude was given
from higher authorities and no account of his previous unblemished career was
taken into consideration. We are told by the author that during WW2 whenever submarines met
unexpectedly at sea, generally in the darkness, a courtesy greeting system had
soon developed, using a mixed language Morse code. The Germans signalled the letters: G-M-Y, standing for: Gott Mit
You, meaning: 'God (be) With You'. The British responded with: M-Y-T, standing
for: Mit You Too, meaning: 'With You Too', while passing each other and at
times even waving their hats. According to the author these unofficial greeting signals swiftly
became known to submariners all over the world and in all navies and are still
used customarily today. I must admit I have never come across this before. This reminds me of a TV programme in which a WW1 Tommy told of the
German's shouting across the trenches, 'Gott Mit You' to which their response
was, ' We've got mittens too' I am not so sure that mutual respect existed between the Royal
Navy and U-Boats, after all, "Today Germany, Tomorrow the World", these U-boats
were pitched against a Navy determined to defeat an evil enemy for the second
time in twenty years. For a long time
it looked as if they would starve us out in these Islands. The author wants us to understand the events we will read about,
therefore some advance information is essential. He states that when you hear and read the war propaganda releases
of all countries, it is quite evident that your soldiers are always the shining
white knights on even whiter horses, while the enemy forces are nothing but
murderers, gangsters, robbers and ugly hostiles with black hats and even
blacker hearts. I think to many; "murderers, gangsters, robbers and ugly hostiles
with black hats and even blacker hearts", would sum up how people felt about
the Germans. He claims that, in reality, most soldiers were drafted men, with a
sprinkling of volunteers and a handful of long-term professionals, who were in
uniform because they did not have much choice in the matter and simply tried to
make the best of it, hoping to survive.
Yes, we have to accept that may have applied to a small percentage, it
certainly did not apply to the Hitler Youth. He then states that during the Second World War submariners were
seen as a rather special breed of man in many ways, a kind of elite group of
sailors. The American and British were nothing but daring heroes, while the
German U-boat men were supposed to be nothing but pirates, killers and
murderers. The author claims it was somewhat different and less black and
white. A total of 40,800 men undertook U-boat training, but 30,226 did not
return from the seas. Another 5,038
became prisoners of war until 5 May 1945. The U-boat Command was assisted and supported by a further 10,900
men in various shore locations. They worked in administrative offices, as
drivers, as guards and watchmen, as kitchen helpers or inventory control
clerks. Others were permanently used as training and school instructors, as
communications clerks, working in the naval mail and censorship department or
in transportation and shipping units. Finally, there were the naval military
courts with many clerks and the naval judge advocates. All of these men were
considered part of the U-boat Command, but they never undertook U-boat
training, and many of them were physically unqualified to serve on U-boats in
any position. John Milton wrote, "They also serve who only stand and wait". What the author doesn't say is why? Why did 30,226 not return from the sea? The answer is because the armed forces of
this county and is particular the Royal Navy supported by the RAF fought a long
bitter battle out in the cold Atlantic, the "Cruel Sea" as one author called
it. The object of that battle was to
make sure they did not return. I was interested to learn that between 1939 and 1945, more than
22,000 German soldiers, sailors and airmen were condemned to death by military
courts and actually executed. This number equals two full-strength infantry
divisions. Another 29,000 soldiers of all service branches were condemned to
death by these same military courts, but their death sentences were commuted to
lesser penalties or to probation in one of the numerous penal companies, or to
service with one of the special bomb or mine defusing and clearing squads.
While they were granted reconsideration of their death sentences, only about
twenty per cent of those reprieved men returned alive from their probationary
assignments, quite a few as cripples: a questionable kind of mercy. In comparison, the British executed 317 soldiers during the war,
most of them for serious criminal offences like murder, including quite a few
men from the various countries of the Empire. The United States of America shot
one single soldier in Europe, Private Eddie Slovik. But he was posthumously rehabilitated,
while all others condemned to death were pardoned and received commuted prison
terms. In addition to these military courts, the Nazi Party functionaries
set up a complete new chain of Party courts for civilians, with hard-nosed
Nazis as judges and prosecutors for the German population at the 'home front',
to keep these folk under tight control. These convinced and fanatical satraps
of Martin Bormann constantly grabbed more power and were increasingly given
more direct help by the state's secret police, the Gestapo. These Nazi Party courts were called 'Brown courts' by the German
population, and they condemned another 12,000 German civilians to death,
ninety per cent by decapitation or hanging. Frequently this was for the
smallest infractions of wartime regulations and special Nazi laws and
prohibitions, like tuning in to foreign radio stations such as the BBC, the
neutral Swiss or Swedish stations or the Voice of America. In an atmosphere of increasing mistrust, fear and danger the
German population was exhorted to report to the Gestapo anybody who might be
suspected of almost anything, telling those people hesitant to denounce others
that it was the obligation of every German citizen, male of female, to help to
strengthen German determination and the will to win the war. What kind of
Regime would execute 22,000 of its own men and condemn to death another 29,000
who were forced to work in penal Companies? This is a book
which should be read because it tries to explain away some of the evil of the
men who did these things. I have always
been puzzled that former German servicemen, do not admit were Nazis Party members. What happened to them all? It was the German people who did these things; we cannot place it to one side and say it was all the Nazis. I have watched many films showing thousands of people cheering at mass rallies. If you asked in Britain, 'hands up all those who belong to the Labour Party', you
would get something near the correct percentage admitting their allegiance, but
what happened to all the Nazis, did only non-party members survive? Books like this
should not be allowed to try to remove the guilt the German people must bear
for turning the whole world upside down, "Today Germany- Tomorrow the World",
NO, Millions died to say NO. At this point I
had finished my review. I sat and gave
it some thought and put it temporarily to one side and quite by chance
purchased two books at the local Flea Market.
They are 'Court Martial' by Alastair Mars who commanded British
submarines in WWII. The other is
'U-Boat 977' by Heinz Schaeffer. The
Forward to the second book caught my eye; it is by Nicholas Monsarrat and even
though it was written in 1952 I want to quote from it. It proves the mood of that time of a man who
fought the U-boats. To the memory of
all of the men who did likewise let it stand.
I quote part of his words. He
said, "If U-boat 977 were not two things-a
readable book, and an engrossing piece of war history-I would not touch it with
a depth-charge. This point is made at the
outset, because I do not wish to figure as an apologist for any part of
Germany's war effort. There have been far too many post-war books, films, and
plays written to expound the thesis that the Germans, though misguided and
misled, were in the main honest manly types who fought the good fight like any
Christian soldier; I do not want to run the risk of seeming to belong to this
gang. You will recall a remarkable discovery
we made when we conquered Germany-that there were actually no Nazis there at
all, just millions of "decent Germans" suffering terribly because of
the awful things they'd been made to do by other people. You will recall a
general readiness to welcome the Germans as good chaps who just went off the
rails for a bit, fellow club-members after all. I do not want to belong to that gang
either. For Nazi Germany was not a nation of
honest dupes and simple soldiers: they knew, all of them, exactly what they
wanted, and they were prepared to go to any lengths to get it. Until they were
beaten (when all colours change over-night) they were total enthusiasts for
world-domination, whole-hearted agents of a hideous tyranny which, if not
finally checked, would have brought the curtain down on human freedom for
generations to come. It was, in fact, all a frightful
mistake. But twice in this century it has been a mistake: twice these people,
and no other, have engulfed the world in misery and bloodshed, in pursuit of
their dream of power. Among the worst of these willing
servants of world enslavement were the men serving in German U-boats: which
brings us to this book. No one save a power maniac, a sadist,
or a nautical romantic can hold any brief for submarine warfare. It is a
repellent form of human behaviour, whether practised by ourselves or by the
Germans; it is cruel, treacherous, and revolting, under any flag. In writing a foreword to such a book, I
am not acting on any forgiveand-forget principle; the author, and men like
him, were trying to kill me and my friends for five years on end in the Battle
of the Atlantic, and I loathed and feared them for it, and I loathe them still.
But it is right that, when the fight is over and the U-boats defeated, we
should try to learn something of the other side of the picture: that we should
know what it was like at the opposite end of the periscope, that we should
understand what made these men tickand, in ticking, kill. For me, the highlight of this book is
a small incident in the early part of it, which describes the sinking of a
tanker. She was sunk in the North Atlantic,
breaking in two in wild weather. There was, of course, no warning given; simply
the sighting, the stalking, the hand on the trigger, the sweet moment of
murder. When it was all over, the author tells us, when the survivors had been
left to die, and the wrecked ship extinguished by the sea, "we put on some
gramophone records, and hear the old songs that remind us of home". The book includes also, to make us
burst into tears, a sigh for something which other U-boats, failing to reach
the Argentine, apparently looked for in vain: a 'decent respect for the
defeated'." Ah, Germany! He concluded by saying, 'but read it
for yourselves'. That applies to this
book just as much. I belong to Nicholas Monsarrat's gang, and having been forced to fight twice: we won. Rob Jerrard HMS
Victory Edition:
1st Authors:
Iain Ballantyne & Jonathan Eastland ISBN:
1844152936 Publishers:
Pen & Sword Price
£19.99 Publication
Date: 2005 Publisher’s
Information. There
is no more illustrious warship name in British naval history than HMS Victory,
which is inextricably linked with Admiral Lord Nelson and the Battle of
Trafalgar. This fascinating book, the latest in the Famous Warships of the
Royal Navy series, celebrates all three at a most appropriate moment - the
200th anniversary of Nelson's greatest triumph and his death in HMS Victory. What is less well known is that six warships before Nelson's carried the name Victory, the first being Sir John Hawkins' during the Battle of the Armada in 1588. All manner of maritime life is included in this book, from piracy in the Azores to gentlemanly encounters between fleets as
well as the battle of annihilation that was Trafalgar. The full horror, majesty
and thunder of naval warfare in the age of fighting sail are revealed through
the firsthand accounts of those who were there. The post-Trafalgar career of
Victory is studied, continuing to the present, for she is still in commission,
as Flagship of the Second Sea Lord. Superbly
illustrated, well researched and written by two leading maritime experts, HMS Victory
will be enjoyed by all those for whom naval heritage and the'Immortal Memory'
of Nelson, his ship and achievements hold a fascination. HMS
VICTORY Battle Honours Armada
1588, Dover 1652, Portland 1653, Gabbard 1653, Scheveningen 1653, Four Days' Battle
1666, Orfordness 1666, Sole Bay 1672, Schooneveld 1673, Texel 1673, Barfleur
1692, Ushant 1781, St Vincent 1797, Trafalgar 1805. Foreword
by Second Sea Lord & Commander-in-Chief Naval Home Command Vice Admiral Sir
James Burnell-Nugent KCB CBE ADC HMS
Victory is the only preserved warship of her age, and while her battle honours
fascinate historians and visitors, her importance resonates beyond the timbers
and the gun decks. The spirit of HMS Victory, which is almost tangible to many
who set foot on her, represents the living heart of the Royal Navy and the
people who have served in it. HMS
Victory is associated forever in our minds with one man, Admiral Nelson, and
with one day, 21 October 1805, on which the Battle of Trafalgar delivered the
knockout blow to Napoleons dreams of invasion. Trafalgar was dramatic; it
speaks to us of pain and duty, heroism and death. But Trafalgar was the
culmination of years of careful, repetitive preparation and training. Although
the battle was won in a single day, the seeds of Nelson's victory were planted
and nurtured in the long years before. For
years before Trafalgar the British Navy had blockaded the enemy's ports across
the coast of Europe. With dogged persistence the sailors in the Fleet endured
day after day, month after month, of a tedious stand-off, waiting for the enemy
to come and engage in a battle that would bring things to a close. Day
after day the men had to repair their own ships, find their own provisions,
cure their own sick, and make their own entertainment. Keeping the fleet at sea
for so long - and for two years during the blockade Nelson never set foot off
Victory - was an unparalleled feat of seamanship and logistics. Of
the 800 or so men in HMS Victory in 1805, the average age was twenty-two (the
same as a modern warship) and while more than half were English, they came from
almost every country in Europe, including France, and also India, Africa and
the Caribbean. Many were volunteers, but up to half were pressed men or
convicts sent to the Fleet as punishment. The myths persist of half-starved
sailors fed on maggoty biscuits and beaten to within an inch of their lives,
but in truth no ship's company could have been flogged into physical fitness
and good morale. How
the Navy kept these men from different backgrounds healthy, fed, trained and
unified into a fighting team was a miracle of leadership, embodied in Nelson
himself. Nelson loved his sailors and took infinite pains to keep them as
healthy and happy as conditions and tight discipline allowed. He cared about
their diet, varied their training, and even altered his cruising to give them
new scenes to look at. The
Battle of Trafalgar was such a decisive victory that it is easy to forget how
hazardous Nelson's master plan was. The British Navy was outnumbered 33-27 by
the French and Spanish and Nelson exposed his ships to devastating broadsides
as they slowly approached the enemy line head on. Only an Admiral supremely
confident of his men's abilities and able to transmit his confidence could have
carried it off. HMS
Victory is still in commission, and every warship salutes her as they pass her
berth in Portsmouth Naval Base. Our modern ships have capabilities unimaginable
to Nelson, but I believe that the values and traditions, which won Trafalgar
and kept our country free are still embodied in the men and women of the Royal
Navy. All
of this keeps HMS Victory and the spirit of Admiral Nelson alive in the modern
Royal Navy. He
was the master of 'mission command' and that is how we command today. He was
the master of genuine and heartfelt care for his sailors and that is what we
strive to do today. He was the master strategist and tactician - just as all
commanding officers and admirals have to be today. Horatio
Nelson, through his remarkable professional example, is a guide, mentor and
tutor to all of us in leadership roles in the Royal Navy of today. Beyond the
Royal Navy, there is much to be learned from Nelsons leadership methods. I
hope, as the story unfolds on the following pages, you will be inspired by the
experiences of the people who lived, fought and died in this immortal ship. It
was their skill, courage and determination that made the name HMS Victory a
legend. HMS
Victory September 2005. Authors’
Introduction On
hearing we were to write a book on HMS Victory, a colleague wondered how this
might be done without merely repeating what was already well known. In
the 200 years since 1805, dozens of works on the Napoleonic era, Trafalgar and
Horatio Nelson have been published. The topic is enduringly popular and likely
to remain so. On the ship HMS Victory, several books exist but the last to
employ a similar approach to telling the story of the ship's fighting life was
published almost half a century ago. Other volumes have considered the ship
mainly from a technical point of view or have deployed statistics as a means of
grappling with Victory's epic tale. While
this book is primarily the story of the current HMS Victory, first commissioned
in 1778, we felt it was important to establish her sense of place in British
history by considering all of the Royal Navy ships that have borne the name.
They too fought in epic battles, carrying remarkable men to death or glory.
Therefore this book is also the story of Hawkins during the Battle of the Armada
and Monson during an ill-fated piratical expedition to the Azores. It touches
on the early demise of Balchen, whose Victory was lost with all hands, and
tells of Myngs, who was shot down on the quarterdeck of an earlier ship of the
name. Nelson's
death in Victory at Trafalgar illustrated one of the salient features of war in
the Age of Sail: admirals and other senior officers were frequently casualties
alongside sailors from the lower deck. A life on the ocean wave was a risky
business, whether because of enemy action or due to disease, malnutrition or
sheer exhaustion (and in the Age of Sail more sailors' lives were claimed by
sickness than by enemy action). When
it comes to the seventh Victory it is amazing how much is unknown, or
forgotten, about her story prior to, and after, Trafalgar. We felt it was
imperative to look beyond the seemingly incomparable Nelson, to his illustrious
predecessors in the seventh Victory. It was from these men that Nelson learned
his craft and it was their courage and intelligence that set the standard he
intended to exceed. Therefore this book is the story of the charming and
audacious Keppel; quick-witted and scientific Kempenfelt; fierce but beloved
Howe; tenacious yet courtly Hood and severe, but caring, Jervis. Then there was
the diplomatic Saumarez, who came after Nelson, and achieved an important, but
largely overlooked, triumph for Britain in the Baltic. We
have also included the stories of men from a lower station in life, such as
Gunner William Rivers, who took his five year old son to sea in Victory. The
lad was soon wounded in action and more than a decade later, still serving in
Victory, would see action at Trafalgar. Then there is poor John Scott, Nelson's
secretary, who met a cruel fate and we also meet Royal Marine musician John
Whick, grieving for a wife believed lost at sea and feeling ignored by his
family back home in England. The
admirals we encounter are not all brave and charming, for Victory's story
contains its share of feeble old men and other flag officers who put their
personal fears (and ambitions) before the good of their country, or indeed the
welfare of the men they commanded. In looking at some familiar events from the
perspective of Victory and the men who sailed in her, we have strived, where
possible, to present fresh material culled from the archives of leading naval
museums which has, until now, been largely overlooked. Inevitably,
the Battle of Trafalgar and Britain's still favourite naval hero, Admiral Lord
Nelson, feature prominently. We were keen not to be overwhelmed by the sheer
scale of the undertaking. The challenges, both from a photographic and a
writing point of view, multiplied with each visit to the ship and the nearby
Naval Museum. Interviewing Victory's current flag officer, Vice Admiral Sir
James Burnell-Nugent, her Commanding Officer, his sailors and other members of
staff emphasized that, far from being an inanimate artefact, the Victory is a
living, breathing part of the Royal Navy. In scaling our Everest we have
endeavoured to keep the summit in view, shrouded though it occasionally was by
clouds of subjective notion; what we sincerely hope, however, is that the
contemporary reader will gain a tangible sense of being a witness to events as
they unfold. It has been an honour to tell the story of HMS Victory in the year
of Trafalgar 200 but we give the final word on the flagship's enduring
significance to the First Sea Lord, Admiral Sir Alan West, who said of her when
interviewed for this book: "I think she should also act as a reminder that the reasons for her being created in the first place still stand, that today and into the future, Britain needs to understand the worth of its Navy and its vital role in securing the nation."
REVIEW
Review
Review
REVIEW
I
eagerly awaited this book once I knew it was due to be published. For those not ex-Navy, HMS St Vincent, the
last to bear the name was the Boys’ Training Establishment in Gosport,
Hampshire, which existed from 1927-1968.
We trained there for a year under the watchful eyes of the Officers and
Instructors, and of course ‘Old Jarvie’ the figurehead of Earl St Vincent.
which, as it were, sets the
scene showing where Saintes actually is.
Not many of my generation will know the Caribbean, you needed to be rich
or in the Royal Navy to visit such exotic places with such exciting names as,
Barbados, St Vincent, St Lucia, Martinique, Dominica, Guadeloupe, Monserrat,
Antigua, Nevis, St Kitts, St Eustatis and Barbuda. It reminds me of my stamp collecting when I was young. Iles de Saintes is half way up this list
going south to north.